Effects of renewable energy on landscape in Europe: Comparison of hydro, wind, solar, bio-, geothermal and infrastructure energy landscapes-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Effects of renewable energy on landscape in Europe: Comparison of hydro, wind, solar, bio-, geothermal and infrastructure energy landscapes

Published:2019-12-28 Issue:4 Volume:68 Page:317-339
ISSN:2064-5031
Container-title:Hungarian Geographical Bulletin
language:
Short-container-title:HunGeoBull

Author:

Frolova Marina¹^ORCID,Centeri Csaba²^ORCID,Benediktsson Karl³^ORCID,Hunziker Marcel⁴^ORCID,Kabai Robert⁵,Scognamiglio Alessandra⁶^ORCID,Martinopoulos Georgios⁷^ORCID,Sismani Georgia⁸,Brito Paulo⁹^ORCID,Muñoz-Cerón Emilio¹⁰^ORCID,Słupiński Mateusz¹¹,Ghislanzoni Michela¹²^ORCID,Braunschweiger Dominik¹³^ORCID,Herrero-Luque Daniel¹⁴^ORCID,Roth Michael¹⁵

Affiliation:

1. Department of Regional and Physical Geography and Institute for Regional Development, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

2. Department of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, Institute of Nature Conservation and Landscape Management, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Szent István University, Gödöllő, Hungary

3. Department of Geography and Tourism, Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, Iceland

4. Social Sciences in Landscape Research Group, Research Unit Economics and Social Sciences, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

5. Hunscapes Ltd., Budapest, Hungary

6. ENEA, Energy Technologies Department, Photovoltaics and Smart Devices Division, Innovative Devices Laboratory, Portici (NA), Italy

7. School of Science and Technology, International Hellenic University, Thessaloniki, Greece

8. Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

9. Polytechnic Institute of Portalegre, Campus Politécnico, Portalegre, Portugal

10. Department of Graphic Engineering, Design and Projects and Centre for Advanced Studies in Energy and Environment, University of Jaen, Jaén, Spain

11. Centre for System Solutions, Wroclaw, Poland

12. Territoria, AyGM SL, Seville, Spain

13. Regional Economics and Development Research Group, Research Unit Economics and Social Sciences, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

14. Department of History, Geography and Communication, Faculty of Humanities, University of Burgos, Burgos, Spain

15. Nürtingen-Geislingen University, School of Landscape Architecture, Environmental and Urban Planning, Nürtingen, Germany

Abstract

Landscape quality has become a fundamental issue in the development of renewable energy (henceforth abbreviated RE) projects. Rapid technological advances in RE production and distribution, coupled with changing policy frameworks, bring specific challenges during planning in order to avoid degradation of landscape quality. The current work provides a comprehensive review on RE landscapes and the impacts of RE systems on landscape for most European countries. It is based on a review by an interdisciplinary international team of experts of empirical research findings on landscape impacts of RE from thirty-seven countries that have participated in the COST Action TU1401 Renewable Energy and Landscape Quality (RELY).

Funder

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

European Regional Development Fund

Publisher

Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference109 articles.

1. Abbasi, T. and Abbasi, S.A. 2011. Small hydro and the environmental implications of its extensive utilization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15. (4): 2134–2143.

2. Andrés-Ruiz (de), C., Iranzo-García, E. and Espejo-Marín, C. 2015. Solar thermoelectric power landscapes in Spain. In Renewable Energies and European Landscapes. Lessons from Southern European Cases. Eds.: Frolova, M., Prados, M. and Nadaï, A., Dordrecht, Springer, 237–254.

3. Arnórsson, S. 2011. Jarðhiti á Íslandi: Eðli auðlindar og ending – Verklag við undirbúning að vinnslu – Umhverfisáhrif af nýtingu. Reykjavík, Rammaáætlun.

4. Azar, C. 2005. Emerging scarcities – bioenergy-food competition in a carbon constrained world. In Scarcity and growth revisited: natural resources and the environment in the new millennium. Eds.: Simpson, R.D., Toman, M.A. and Ayres, R.U., Washington D. C., Resources for the Future, 98–120.

5. Bakken, T.H., Aase, A.G., Hagen, D., Sundt, H., Barton, D.N. and Lujala, P. 2014. Demonstrating a new framework for the comparison of environmental impacts from small- and large-scale hydropower and wind power projects. Journal of Environmental Management 140. 93–101.

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Incorporating public perception of Renewable Energy Landscapes in local spatial planning tools: A case study in Mediterranean countries;Applied Geography;2024-09

2. Arguments for a Community-Based Approach to Geothermal Energy Development;Energies;2024-05-10

3. The trade-off between socio-environmental awareness and renewable penetration targets in energy transition roadmaps;Applied Energy;2024-02

4. European Green Deal + Poland + hydroelectric plants = Future?;Hungarian Geographical Bulletin;2024-01-12

5. Renewable electricity generation and carbon emissions in leading European countries: Daily-based disaggregate evidence by nonlinear approaches;Energy Strategy Reviews;2024-01