The Image of the Right to Privacy in Selected Polish Constitutional Court Cases

Author:

Oręziak BartłomiejORCID

Abstract

This research article aims to present an image of the right to privacy in selected Polish constitutional court cases. The paper starts with a concise introduction indicating the scope of the study, the justification for undertaking the analysis, and the methodology used. As part of the introduction, the current structure of the judiciary in Poland will also be presented. The court cases related to the right to privacy heard by the Polish Constitutional Tribunal will then be presented with a focus on considerations related to the understanding of the concept of the right to privacy, its content, scope, and elements, and the legally justified premises limiting this human right. Such judgments are based on the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. This will be done on the basis of three judgments of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal of significant importance to the title issue. As part of these considerations, reference will also be made to numerous other judgments of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, so that the presented discourse has the broadest possible context. The paper ends with a concise summary containing original observations related to the matter being discussed.

Publisher

Central European Journal of Comparative Law

Reference26 articles.

1. Algero, M. G. (2005) ‘The Sources of Law and the Value of Precedent: A Comparative and Empirical Study of a Civil Law State in a Common Law Nation’, Louisiana Law Review, 65(2), pp. 775–822.

2. Barański M. (2015) ‘Odpowiedzialność konstytucyjna w Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej’ in Barański, M., Czyż, A., Rajczyk, R. (eds.) Sądownictwo konstytucyjne w państwach Grupy Wyszehradzkiej: perspektywa politologiczno-prawna. pp. 31–49.

3. Braxton. J. C. (1976) ‘Personhood: The Right to Be Let Alone’, Duke Law Review, 25(4), pp. 699–720; https://doi.org/10.2307/1371935.

4. Chałubińska-Jentkiewicz, K. (2020) ‘Jawność życia publicznego jako konstytucyjna reguła dostępu do informacji publicznej a ponowne wykorzystywanie informacji sektora publicznego’, Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego, 2020(53), pp. 299–314; https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2020.01.17.

5. Cope, G. (1978) ‘To Be Let Alone: Florida's Proposed Right of Privacy’, Florida State University Law Review, 6(3), pp. 673–773.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3