The European Parliament Against the Background of the Rule of Law and the Standards of a Parliamentary System: Selected Issues

Author:

Pastuszko GrzegorzORCID

Abstract

The aim of this study is to show the legal status and mechanism of action of the European Parliament against the background of classical standards of the rule of law in a democratic system. This study shows the extent of the deviation of the European Parliament from these standards and highlights its special features by using historical-, theoretical-, and dogmatic-legal methods. This helps to understand what parliamentarism is built into the present concept of the rule of law, and what distinguishes it from the classically understood assumptions of a parliamentary system. Specifically, this study comprises three key issues: the nature of the subject that equips the Parliament with democratic legitimacy, the way it is situated in the mechanism of power or, finally, the extent to which it is bound by existing legal norms. This research perspective is, of course, limited in nature and deals with selected issues. The crux of the study makes the reader aware that at the level of the European Union a new type of parliament and, consequently, a new type of parliamentarism has developed, and the rule of law applicable here is clearly different from the analogous principle found in traditional states.

Publisher

Central European Journal of Comparative Law

Reference28 articles.

1. Barnard, C. (2008) ‘The ‘Opt-Out’ for the UK and Poland from the Charter of Fundamental Rights: Triumph of Rhetoric over Reality?’ in Griller, S., Ziller, J. (eds.) The Lisbon Treaty: EU, Constitutionalism without a Constitutional Treaty? New York: Springer, pp. 257–283; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-09429-7_11.

2. Dubowski, T. (2010) Równowaga instytucjonalna w Unii Europejskiej – wybrane zagadnienia w świetle postanwień Traktatu z Lizbony. Warsaw: Temida 2.

3. Dziadzio, A. (2005) ‘Koncepcja państwa prawa w XIX wieku – idea i rzeczywistość’, Czasopismo Historyczno-Prawne, 17(1), pp. 177–201.

4. Garben, S. (2019) ‘Competence Creep Revisited’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(2), pp. 205–222; https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12643.

5. Grosse, T.G. (2008) ‘Deficyt demokratyczny w Unii Europejskiej i metody jego przezwyciężania’ in Kurczewska, U. (ed.) Deficyt demokracji w Unii Europejskiej a europejskie grupy interesu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, pp. 75–96.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3