Diagnostic Accuracy of the Amsler Grid Test for Detecting Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Author:

Bjerager Jakob1,Schneider Miklos12,Potapenko Ivan1,van Dijk Elon H. C.34,Faber Carsten15,Grauslund Jakob678,Pfau Kristina910,Huemer Josef11,Muttuvelu Danson V.112,Rasmussen Marie L. R.15,Sabaner M. Cem13,Subhi Yousif17

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark

2. Department of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

3. Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands

4. Department of Ophthalmology, Haga Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands

5. Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

6. Department of Ophthalmology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

7. Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

8. Department of Ophthalmology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway

9. Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany

10. Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland

11. National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom

12. MitØje Aps, Skive, Denmark

13. Department of Ophthalmology, Kütahya Health Sciences University, Evliya Celebi Training and Research Hospital, Kütahya, Turkey

Abstract

ImportancePatients with nonneovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) are encouraged to use the Amsler grid test for self-assessment to facilitate early diagnosis. The test is widely recommended, suggesting a belief that it signals worsening AMD, warranting its use in home monitoring.ObjectiveTo systematically review studies of the diagnostic test accuracy of the Amsler grid in the diagnosis of neovascular AMD and to perform diagnostic test accuracy meta-analyses.Data SourcesA systematic literature search was conducted in 12 databases for relevant titles from database inception until May 7, 2022.Study SelectionStudies included those with groups defined as having (1) neovascular AMD and (2) either healthy eyes or eyes with nonneovascular AMD. The index test was the Amsler grid. The reference standard was ophthalmic examination. After removal of obviously irrelevant reports, 2 authors (J.B. and M.S.) independently screened the remaining references in full text for potential eligibility. Disagreements were resolved by a third author (Y.S.).Data Extraction and SynthesisTwo authors (J.B. and I.P.) independently extracted all data and evaluated quality and applicability of eligible studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. Disagreements were resolved by a third author (Y.S.).Main Outcomes and MeasuresSensitivity and specificity of the Amsler grid for detecting neovascular AMD with comparators being either healthy control participants or patients with nonneovascular AMD.ResultsOf 523 records screened, 10 studies were included with a total of 1890 eyes (mean participant age ranging from 62 to 83 years). Sensitivity and specificity to diagnose neovascular AMD were 67% (95% CI, 51%-79%) and 99% (95% CI, 85%-100%), respectively, when comparators were healthy control participants and 71% (95% CI, 60%-80%) and 63% (95% CI, 49%-51%), respectively, when control participants were patients with nonneovascular AMD. Overall, potential sources of bias were low across studies.Conclusions and RelevanceAlthough the Amsler grid is easy and inexpensive to use for detection of metamorphopsia, its sensitivity may be at levels typically not recommended for monitoring. Coupling this lower sensitivity with only moderate specificity to identify neovascular AMD in a population at risk, these findings suggest that such patients typically should be encouraged to undergo ophthalmic examination regularly, regardless of any results of Amsler grid self-assessment.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Ophthalmology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3