Uncorrected Refractive Error in the African American Eye Disease Study

Author:

Dhablania Nathan1,Torres Mina1,Burkemper Bruce2,McKean-Cowdin Roberta2,Varma Rohit1, ,Jiang Xuejuan3,Lastra Carlos3,Fairbrother-Crisp Alicia3,Choudhury Farzana3,Adamashvili Tengiz3,Corona Elizabeth3,Wang YuPing3,Linton Judith3,Douglas Jacqueline3,Milo Kisha3,Barrera Jaime3,John Lisa3,Weinstein Nicole3,Van Leeuwen Natasha3,Clark James3,Ramirez Sandra3,Wong Tien3,Jaganathan Soundaram3,Hamzah Haslina3,Wilson M. Roy3,Haller Julia A.3,Hazuda Helen3,Higginbotham Eve J.3,Katz Joanne3,Dankwa-Mullan Irene3,Redford Maryann3,Zhang Xinzhi3

Affiliation:

1. Southern California Eye Institute, CHA Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center, Los Angeles

2. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles

3. for the African American Eye Disease Study Group

Abstract

ImportanceRefractive error remains the largest cause of correctable visual impairment in the US. Correction of refractive error will reduce visual impairment and its associated morbidity but also improve quality of life and productivity.ObjectiveTo determine the burden of and risk factors (RFs) associated with any uncorrected refractive error (UCRE) and unmet refractive need (URN) in a population-based sample of African American adults.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study, conducted from April 2014 to April 2018, included a population-based sample of self-identified African American participants 40 years and older from 30 contiguous census tracts in Inglewood, California. Participants underwent a complete ophthalmic examination and an in-home–administered questionnaire to assess sociodemographic, lifestyle, biological, medical, and health care and eye care usage RFs associated with UCRE and URN. Measurements of visual acuity (VA) were performed using a standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol. Noncycloplegic automated refraction with supplemental subjective refraction was performed. UCRE was defined as an improvement of 2 or more lines with refraction in the better-seeing eye. URN was defined as an improvement of 2 or more lines with refraction in the better-seeing eye in those persons who were visually impaired. Sex- and age-specific burden of UCRE and URN were calculated, and multiple regression analyses were used to identify independent RFs. Study data were analyzed from May 2018 to December 2023.ExposuresPresence or absence of correctable refractive error.Main Outcomes and MeasuresSelf-reported sex- and age-specific prevalence of and risk indicators of UCRE and URN.ResultsOf the 7957 eligible participants in the African American Eye Disease Study (AFEDS), 6347 (80%) completed both the in-home interview and the clinical examination. Of these, 6337 participants (mean [SD] age, 61 [11] years; 3997 female [63%]) with complete refractive error data were included in the analysis. Refractive error–related correctable visual impairment was present in over two-thirds of participants with visual impairment (68.7%). The overall prevalence of any UCRE was 14.6% (925 of 6337), and the overall prevalence of any URN was 5.4% (URN1 [those with presenting VA of worse than 20/40 in the better-seeing eye but who could achieve 20/40 or better with correction], 157 of 2893; URN2 [those with presenting VA of worse than 20/40 in the better-seeing eye but who could achieve an improvement of 2 or more lines with refractive correction], 155 of 2891).Conclusions and RelevanceResults of this cross-sectional study suggest a high burden of refractive error–associated correctable refractive error in African American adults, making it the leading cause of visual impairment in this population. Providing universal coverage for vision care and prescription glasses is an affordable and achievable health care intervention that could reduce the burden of visual impairment in African American adults by over two-thirds and likely raise the quality of life and work productivity, especially in this vulnerable minority population.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3