Cost-Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy vs Open Radical Cystectomy for Patients With Bladder Cancer
-
Published:2023-06-30
Issue:6
Volume:6
Page:e2317255
-
ISSN:2574-3805
-
Container-title:JAMA Network Open
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JAMA Netw Open
Author:
Dixon Simon12, Hill Harry1, Flight Laura13, Khetrapal Pramit4, Ambler Gareth5, Williams Norman R.6, Brew-Graves Chris5, Kelly John D.4, Catto James W. F.178, Groves E Ruth9, Goodwin Louise9, Willson Jayne9, Ravencroft Phillip9, Kennish Stephen9, Rosario Derek J9, Torrington Carol9, Nair Rajesh9, Thurairaja Ramesh9, Amery Sue9, Chatterton Kathryn9, Broadhead Samantha9, Hendry David9, Zreik Abdullah9, Jain Sunjay9, Prescott Steve9, Roberts Hannah9, Morgan Angela9, Main Chris9, Bedford Elspeth9, Wiseman Lorraine9, Mpofu Bernice9, Daisey Claire9, Donachie Michelle9, Aning Jon9, Johnson Lyndsey9, Brain Carol9, Shiridzinomwa Constance9, Ebon Martin9, Hampson Alexander9, Schimmel Roisin9, Horsley Scott9, Nembhard Sayyida9, Collins Clare9, Gilmore Jemma9, Wilson Faith9, Peacock Louise9, Lim Sheena9, Gabriel Rhosyll9, Sarpong Rachael9, Tan Melanie9,
Affiliation:
1. School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England 2. PRICELESS SA (Priority Cost Effective Lessons for System Strengthening South Africa), School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa 3. National Institute for Health Care Excellence, Manchester, England 4. Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, England 5. Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, England 6. Surgical & Interventional Trials Unit, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, England 7. Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England 8. Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS (National Health Service) Foundation Trust, Sheffield, England 9. for the iROC Study Team
Abstract
ImportanceThe value to payers of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) when compared with open radical cystectomy (ORC) for patients with bladder cancer is unclear.ObjectivesTo compare the cost-effectiveness of iRARC with that of ORC.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis economic evaluation used individual patient data from a randomized clinical trial at 9 surgical centers in the United Kingdom. Patients with nonmetastatic bladder cancer were recruited from March 20, 2017, to January 29, 2020. The analysis used a health service perspective and a 90-day time horizon, with supplementary analyses exploring patient benefits up to 1 year. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken. Data were analyzed from January 13, 2022, to March 10, 2023.InterventionsPatients were randomized to receive either iRARC (n = 169) or ORC (n = 169).Main Outcomes and MeasuresCosts of surgery were calculated using surgery timings and equipment costs, with other hospital data based on counts of activity. Quality-adjusted life-years were calculated from European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level instrument responses. Prespecified subgroup analyses were undertaken based on patient characteristics and type of diversion.ResultsA total of 305 patients with available outcome data were included in the analysis, with a mean (SD) age of 68.3 (8.1) years, and of whom 241 (79.0%) were men. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy was associated with statistically significant reductions in admissions to intensive therapy (6.35% [95% CI, 0.42%-12.28%]), and readmissions to hospital (14.56% [95% CI, 5.00%-24.11%]), but increases in theater time (31.35 [95% CI, 13.67-49.02] minutes). The additional cost of iRARC per patient was £1124 (95% CI, −£576 to £2824 [US $1622 (95% CI, −$831 to $4075)]) with an associated gain in quality-adjusted life-years of 0.01124 (95% CI, 0.00391-0.01857). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £100 008 (US $144 312) per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy had a much higher probability of being cost-effective for subgroups defined by age, tumor stage, and performance status.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this economic evaluation of surgery for patients with bladder cancer, iRARC reduced short-term morbidity and some associated costs. While the resulting cost-effectiveness ratio was in excess of thresholds used by many publicly funded health systems, patient subgroups were identified for which iRARC had a high probability of being cost-effective.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03049410
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|