Trends in Resources for Neonatal Intensive Care at Delivery Hospitals for Infants Born Younger Than 30 Weeks’ Gestation, 2009-2020

Author:

Boghossian Nansi S.1,Geraci Marco2,Phibbs Ciaran S.34,Lorch Scott A.56,Edwards Erika M.789,Horbar Jeffrey D.79

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia

2. MEMOTEF Department, School of Economics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

3. Health Economics Resource Center and Center for Implementation to Innovation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California

4. Perinatal Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

5. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

6. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

7. Vermont Oxford Network, Burlington, Vermont

8. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Vermont, Burlington

9. Department of Pediatrics, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington

Abstract

ImportanceIn an ideal regionalized system, all infants born very preterm would be delivered at a large tertiary hospital capable of providing all necessary care.ObjectiveTo examine whether the distribution of extremely preterm births changed between 2009 and 2020 based on neonatal intensive care resources at the delivery hospital.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at 822 Vermont Oxford Network (VON) centers in the US between 2009 and 2020. Participants included infants born at 22 to 29 weeks’ gestation, delivered at or transferred to centers participating in the VON. Data were analyzed from February to December 2022.ExposuresHospital of birth at 22 to 29 weeks’ gestation.Main Outcomes and MeasuresBirthplace neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) level was classified as A, restriction on assisted ventilation or no surgery; B, major surgery; or C, cardiac surgery requiring bypass. Level B centers were further divided into low-volume (<50 inborn infants at 22 to 29 weeks’ gestation per year) and high-volume (≥50 inborn infants at 22 to 29 weeks’ gestation per year) centers. High-volume level B and level C centers were combined, resulting in 3 distinct NICU categories: level A, low-volume B, and high-volume B and C NICUs. The main outcome was the change in the percentage of births at hospitals with level A, low-volume B, and high-volume B or C NICUs overall and by US Census region.ResultsA total of 357 181 infants (mean [SD] gestational age, 26.4 [2.1] weeks; 188 761 [52.9%] male) were included in the analysis. Across regions, the Pacific (20 239 births [38.3%]) had the lowest while the South Atlantic (48 348 births [62.7%]) had the highest percentage of births at a hospital with a high-volume B– or C-level NICU. Births at hospitals with A-level NICUs increased by 5.6% (95% CI, 4.3% to 7.0%), and births at low-volume B–level NICUs increased by 3.6% (95% CI, 2.1% to 5.0%), while births at hospitals with high-volume B– or C-level NICUs decreased by 9.2% (95% CI, −10.3% to −8.1%). By 2020, less than half of the births for infants at 22 to 29 weeks’ gestation occurred at hospitals with high-volume B– or C-level NICUs. Most US Census regions followed the nationwide trends; for example, births at hospitals with high-volume B– or C-level NICUs decreased by 10.9% [95% CI, −14.0% to −7.8%) in the East North Central region and by 21.1% (95% CI, −24.0% to −18.2%) in the West South Central region.Conclusions and RelevanceThis retrospective cohort study identified concerning deregionalization trends in birthplace hospital level of care for infants born at 22 to 29 weeks’ gestation. These findings should serve to encourage policy makers to identify and enforce strategies to ensure that infants at the highest risk of adverse outcomes are born at the hospitals where they have the best chances to attain optimal outcomes.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3