Optimal Oral Iron Therapy for Iron Deficiency Anemia Among US Veterans

Author:

Patel Nilang12,Silvey Scott G.23,Arora Pradeep45,Feldman George M.12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond

2. Division of Nephrology, Central Virginia VA Healthcare System, Richmond

3. Department of Biostatistics Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond

4. Department of Medicine, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York

5. Division of Nephrology, VA Western New York Healthcare System, Buffalo

Abstract

ImportanceOptimal oral iron supplementation strategy is unclear in patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) who have either normal kidney function (NKF) or chronic kidney disease (CKD).ObjectiveTo investigate the association of different oral iron supplementation strategies with the change in hemoglobin and iron indices among patients with IDA with either NKF or CKD.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2009 and 2019 at nationwide Veterans Health Administration facilities. Eligible participants included veterans with IDA (defined as hemoglobin <12 g/dL and either iron saturation <20% or ferritin <50 ng/mL) who received their first outpatient prescription of oral iron. Patients were further divided into those with NKF (estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥15 mL/min/1.73 m2 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Data analysis was conducted from February to October 2023.ExposuresPatients were classified into 3 groups based on their oral iron dosing schedule: daily (once a day), multiple doses per day (MDD; ≥2 times per day), or alternate-day dose (ADD).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were change of hemoglobin, ferritin, total iron binding capacity (TIBC), and iron saturation (ISAT), which were calculated with linear mixed-effects models.ResultsA total of 71 677 veterans with IDA (63 202 male [88.2%] and 8475 female [11.8%]; mean [SD] age, 68.47 [13.09] years), including 47 201 with NKF and 24 476 with CKD, were identifed. In patients with NKF in the daily group, hemoglobin increased from baseline (estimated per-30-day difference [SE], 0.27 [0.00] g/dL; P < .001). In comparison with the daily group, hemoglobin increased more in the MDD group (estimated per-30-day difference [SE], 0.08 [0.03] g/dL; P < .001), but no difference was noted in the ADD group (estimated per-30-day difference [SE], −0.01 [0.01] g/dL; P = .38). Ferritin, ISAT, and TIBC results were similar, except TIBC showed less change in the ADD group compared with the daily group. Patients with CKD showed similar trends but smaller magnitudes in changes. Among patients with NKF, the adjusted mean increase in hemoglobin was 1.03 g/dL (95% CI, 1.01-1.06 g/dL) for those in the daily group, 1.38 g/dL (95% CI, 1.36-1.40 g/dL) for those in the MDD group, and 0.93 g/dL (95% CI, 0.84-1.02 g/dL) for those in the ADD group at 90 days. Among patients with CKD, the adjusted mean increase in hemoglobin was 0.71 g/dL (95% CI, 0.68-0.73 g/dL) for those in the daily group, 0.99 g/dL (95% CI, 0.97-1.01 g/dL) for those in the MDD group, and 0.62 g/dL (95% CI, 0.52-0.73 g/dL) for those in the ADD group at 90 days.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this retrospective cohort study of veterans with IDA, there was no significant difference in the improvement of hemoglobin and iron indices between daily and ADD groups, but quickest improvement was observed in the MDD group. These findings suggest that the choice of oral iron therapy should depend on the rapidity of response desired and patient preference due to adverse effects.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Reference17 articles.

1. Efficacy of weekly compared with daily iron supplementation.;Cook;Am J Clin Nutr,1995

2. Management of iron deficiency.;Ning;Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program,2019

3. Iron deficiency anemia: evaluation and management.;Short;Am Fam Physician,2013

4. Iron deficiency anaemia.;Lopez;Lancet,2016

5. Hepcidin and iron homeostasis.;Ganz;Biochim Biophys Acta,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3