Implementation Facilitation to Promote Emergency Department–Initiated Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder

Author:

D’Onofrio Gail123,Edelman E. Jennifer2,Hawk Kathryn F.1,Chawarski Marek C.14,Pantalon Michael V.1,Owens Patricia H.1,Martel Shara H.1,Rothman Richard5,Saheed Mustapha5,Schwartz Robert P.6,Cowan Ethan7,Richardson Lynne8,Salsitz Edwin9,Lyons Michael S.1011,Freiermuth Caroline1011,Wilder Christine1112,Whiteside Lauren13,Tsui Judith I.14,Klein Jared W.14,Coupet Edouard1,O’Connor Patrick G.2,Matthews Abigail G.15,Murphy Sean M.16,Huntley Kristen17,Fiellin David A.123

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

2. Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

3. Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut

4. Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

5. Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

6. Friends Research Institute, Baltimore, Maryland

7. Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York

8. Institute for Health Equity Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York

9. Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York

10. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio

11. Center for Addiction Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio

12. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio

13. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle,

14. Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle

15. The Emmes Company, Rockville, Maryland

16. Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York

17. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, Maryland

Abstract

ImportanceEmergency department (ED)–initiated buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) is underused.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether provision of ED-initiated buprenorphine with referral for OUD increased after implementation facilitation (IF), an educational and implementation strategy.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis multisite hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation nonrandomized trial compared grand rounds with IF, with pre-post 12-month baseline and IF evaluation periods, at 4 academic EDs. The study was conducted from April 1, 2017, to November 30, 2020. Participants were ED and community clinicians treating patients with OUD and observational cohorts of ED patients with untreated OUD. Data were analyzed from July 16, 2021, to July 14, 2022.ExposureA 60-minute in-person grand rounds was compared with IF, a multicomponent facilitation strategy that engaged local champions, developed protocols, and provided learning collaboratives and performance feedback.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were the rate of patients in the observational cohorts who received ED-initiated buprenorphine with referral for OUD treatment (primary implementation outcome) and the rate of patients engaged in OUD treatment at 30 days after enrollment (effectiveness outcome). Additional implementation outcomes included the numbers of ED clinicians with an X-waiver to prescribe buprenorphine and ED visits with buprenorphine administered or prescribed and naloxone dispensed or prescribed.ResultsA total of 394 patients were enrolled during the baseline evaluation period and 362 patients were enrolled during the IF evaluation period across all sites, for a total of 756 patients (540 [71.4%] male; mean [SD] age, 39.3 [11.7] years), with 223 Black patients (29.5%) and 394 White patients (52.1%). The cohort included 420 patients (55.6%) who were unemployed, and 431 patients (57.0%) reported unstable housing. Two patients (0.5%) received ED-initiated buprenorphine during the baseline period, compared with 53 patients (14.6%) during the IF evaluation period (P < .001). Forty patients (10.2%) were engaged with OUD treatment during the baseline period, compared with 59 patients (16.3%) during the IF evaluation period (P = .01). Patients in the IF evaluation period who received ED-initiated buprenorphine were more likely to be in treatment at 30 days (19 of 53 patients [35.8%]) than those who did not 40 of 309 patients (12.9%; P < .001). Additionally, there were increases in the numbers of ED clinicians with an X-waiver (from 11 to 196 clinicians) and ED visits with provision of buprenorphine (from 259 to 1256 visits) and naloxone (from 535 to 1091 visits).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this multicenter effectiveness-implementation nonrandomized trial, rates of ED-initiated buprenorphine and engagement in OUD treatment were higher in the IF period, especially among patients who received ED-initiated buprenorphine.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03023930

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3