Goals of Care Among Patients With Advanced Cancer and Their Family Caregivers in the Last Years of Life

Author:

Ozdemir Semra12,Chaudhry Isha1,Malhotra Chetna1,Teo Irene13,Finkelstein Eric Andrew124, ,Singh Ratna5,Dent Rebecca A.5,Cheung Yin Bun5,Malhotra Rahul5,Kanesvaran Ravindran5,Yee Alethea Chung Pheng5,Chan Noreen5,Wu Huei Yaw5,Chin Soh Mun5,Hum Allyn Yin Mei5,Yang Grace Meijuan5,Neo Patricia Soek Hui5,Nadkarni Nivedita V5

Affiliation:

1. Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore

2. Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

3. Department of Psychosocial Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore

4. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore

5. for the Cost of Medical Care of Patients With Advanced Serious Illness in Singapore (COMPASS) Study Group

Abstract

ImportanceUnderstanding goals of care for terminally ill patients at the end of life is crucial to ensure that patients receive care consistent with their preferences.ObjectivesTo investigate the patterns of goals of care among patient-caregiver dyads over the last years of the patient’s life and the associations of the goals of care with patient-caregiver characteristics.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis prospective cohort study of 210 patient-caregiver dyads involved surveys every 3 months from July 8, 2016, until the patient’s death or February 28, 2022. Data from the last 2 years of the patients’ lives were analyzed. Dyads, which comprised patients with stage IV solid cancer and their caregivers, were recruited from outpatient clinics at 2 major cancer centers in Singapore.Main Outcomes and MeasuresGoals of care were examined via the tradeoffs between life extension and symptom management and between life extension and cost containment. The actor-partner interdependence framework was implemented using mixed-effects linear regressions.ResultsThis study included 210 dyads (patients: mean [SD] age, 62.6 [10.5] years; 108 men [51.4%]; caregivers: mean [SD] age, 49.4 [14.6] years; 132 women [62.9%]). On average, 34% of patients (264 of 780 observations; range, 23%-42%) and 29% of caregivers (225 of 780 observations; range, 20%-43%) prioritized symptom management over life extension, whereas 24% of patients (190 of 780 observations; range, 18%-32%) and 19% of caregivers (148 of 780 observations; range, 8%-26%) prioritized life extension. Between cost containment and life extension, on average, 28% of patients (220 of 777 observations; range, 22%-38%) and 17% of caregivers (137 of 780 observations; range, 10%-25%) prioritized cost containment, whereas 26% of patients (199 of 777 observations; range, 18%-34%) and 35% of caregivers (271 of 780 observations; range, 25%-45%) prioritized life extension. Goals of care did not change as patients approached death. Patients prioritized symptom management if they experienced higher symptom burden (average marginal effect [SE], 0.04 [0.01]), worse spiritual well-being (average marginal effect [SE], −0.04 [0.01]), and accurate (vs inaccurate) prognostic awareness (average marginal effect [SE], 0.40 [0.18]) and if their caregivers reported accurate prognostic awareness (average marginal effect [SE], 0.53 [0.18]), lower impact of caregiving on finances (average marginal effect [SE], −0.28 [0.08]), and poorer caregiving self-esteem (average marginal effect [SE], −0.48 [0.16]). Compared with patients, caregivers expressed lower preferences for cost containment (average marginal effect [SE], −0.63 [0.09]). Patients prioritized cost containment if they were older (average marginal effect [SE], 0.03 [0.01]), had higher symptom burden (average marginal effect [SE], 0.04 [0.01]), had poorer spiritual well-being (average marginal effect [SE], −0.04 [0.01]), and their caregivers reported poorer caregiving self-esteem (average marginal effect [SE], −0.51 [0.16]) and more family support (average marginal effect [SE], −0.30 [0.14]).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study of patient-caregiver dyads, findings suggested the importance of interventions aimed at reducing discordance in goals of care between patients and caregivers and helping them develop realistic expectations to avoid costly, futile treatments.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3