Open-Label Placebo Injection for Chronic Back Pain With Functional Neuroimaging

Author:

Ashar Yoni K.1,Sun Michael2,Knight Karen3,Flood Thomas F.4,Anderson Zachary5,Kaptchuk Ted J.6,Wager Tor D.2

Affiliation:

1. Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora

2. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire

3. Panorama Orthopedics and Spine Center, Golden, Colorado

4. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

5. Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois

6. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

ImportanceChronic back pain (CBP) is a leading cause of disability. Placebo treatments often provide as much pain relief as bona fide treatments, such as steroid injections. Open-label (honestly prescribed) placebos (OLPs) may relieve CBP without deception, but OLP mechanisms remain poorly understood.ObjectiveTo investigate the long-term efficacy and neurobiological mechanisms of OLP for CBP.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA randomized clinical trial of CBP with longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) comparing OLP with usual care, with 1-year follow-up, was conducted in a university research setting and a community orthopedic clinic. Participants were individuals aged 21 to 70 years with CBP. The trial was conducted from November 2017 to August 2018, with 1-year follow-up completed by November 2019. Data analysis was performed from April 2020 to May 2024. The primary analysis was conducted on an intention-to-treat sample.InterventionsParticipants randomized to OLP received a 1-time subcutaneous lumbar saline injection presented as placebo accompanied by information about the power of placebo to relieve pain, alongside their ongoing care. Usual care participants continued their ongoing care.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was pain intensity (0-10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 the most intense) at 1 month posttreatment. Secondary outcomes included pain interference, depression, anxiety, anger, and sleep quality. Functional MRI was performed before and after treatment during evoked and spontaneous back pain.ResultsA total of 101 adults (52 [51.4%] females; mean [SD] age, 40.4 [15.4] years) with moderate severity CBP (mean [SD], 4.10 [1.25] intensity; duration, 9.7 [8.5] years) were enrolled. Compared with usual care, OLP reduced CBP intensity posttreatment (relative reduction, 0.61; Hedges g = 0.45; 95% CI, −0.89 to 0.04; P = .02). Through 1-year follow-up, pain relief did not persist, although significant benefits were observed for depression, anger, anxiety, and sleep disruption (Hedges g = 0.3-0.5; all P < .03). Brain responses to evoked back pain for OLP vs usual care increased in rostral anterior cingulate and ventromedial prefrontal cortex and decreased in somatomotor cortices and thalamus. During spontaneous pain, functional connectivity analyses identified OLP vs usual care increases in ventromedial prefrontal cortex connectivity to the rostral ventral medulla, a pain-modulatory brainstem nucleus. No adverse effects of treatment were reported by participants.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized clinical trial of OLP vs usual care, a single nondeceptive placebo injection reduced CBP intensity for 1 month posttreatment and provided benefits lasting for at least 1 year posttreatment. Brain mechanisms of OLP in a clinical population overlap with those of deceptive placebos in healthy volunteers, including engagement of prefrontal-brainstem pain modulatory pathways.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03294148

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Reference57 articles.

1. Sham surgery in orthopedics: a systematic review of the literature.;Louw;Pain Med,2017

2. NSAIDs for chronic low back pain.;Enthoven;JAMA,2017

3. Epidural injections for spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the “control” injections in randomized controlled trials.;Bicket;Anesthesiology,2013

4. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures.;Kallmes;N Engl J Med,2009

5. Open-label placebo: reflections on a research agenda.;Kaptchuk;Perspect Biol Med,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3