Disparities in Preoperative Goals of Care Documentation in Veterans

Author:

Wu Adela12,Giannitrapani Karleen F.13,Garcia Ariadna14,Bozkurt Selen15,Boothroyd Derek14,Adams Alyce S.6,Kim Kyung Mi17,Zhang Shiqi14,McCaa Matthew D.1,Morris Arden M.89,Shreve Scott1011,Lorenz Karl A.13

Affiliation:

1. VA Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, California

2. Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

3. Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

4. Quantitative Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California

5. Evaluation Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California

6. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California

7. Office of Research Patient Care Services, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, California

8. S-SPIRE Center, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

9. Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, California

10. Lebanon VA Medical Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Lebanon, Pennsylvania

11. Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania

Abstract

ImportancePreoperative goals of care discussion and documentation are important for patients undergoing surgery, a major health care stressor that incurs risk.ObjectiveTo assess the association of race, ethnicity, and other factors, including history of mental health disability, with disparities in preoperative goals of care documentation among veterans.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cross-sectional study assessed data from the Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA) of 229 737 veterans who underwent surgical procedures between January 1, 2017, and October 18, 2022.ExposuresPatient-level (ie, race, ethnicity, medical comorbidities, history of mental health comorbidity) and system-level (ie, facility complexity level) factors.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPreoperative life-sustaining treatment (LST) note documentation or no LST note documentation within 30 days prior to or on day of surgery. The standardized mean differences were calculated to assess the magnitude of differences between groups. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were estimated with logistic regression.ResultsIn this study, 13 408 patients (5.8%) completed preoperative LST from 229 737 VHA patients (209 123 [91.0%] male; 20 614 [9.0%] female; mean [SD] age, 65.5 [11.9] years) who received surgery. Compared with patients who did complete preoperative LST, patients tended to complete preoperative documentation less often if they were female (19 914 [9.2%] vs 700 [5.2%]), Black individuals (42 571 [19.7%] vs 2416 [18.0%]), Hispanic individuals (11 793 [5.5%] vs 631 [4.7%]), or from rural areas (75 637 [35.0%] vs 4273 [31.9%]); had a history of mental health disability (65 974 [30.5%] vs 4053 [30.2%]); or were seen at lowest-complexity (ie, level 3) facilities (7849 [3.6%] vs 78 [0.6%]). Over time, despite the COVID-19 pandemic, patients undergoing surgical procedures completed preoperative LST increasingly more often. Covariate-adjusted estimates of preoperative LST completion demonstrated that patients of racial or ethnic minority background (Black patients: OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.77-0.80; P <.001; patients selecting other race: OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.81; P <.001; Hispanic patients: OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.76-0.81; P <.001) and patients from rural regions (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.93; P <.001) had lower likelihoods of completing LST compared with patients who were White or non-Hispanic and patients from urban areas. Patients with any mental health disability history also had lower likelihood of completing preoperative LST than those without a history (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.92-0.94; P = .001).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study, disparities in documentation rates within a VHA cohort persisted based on race, ethnicity, rurality of patient residence, history of mental health disability, and access to high-volume, high-complexity facilities.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3