Longitudinal Household Assessment of Respiratory Illness in Children and Parents During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author:

de Hoog Marieke L. A.1,Sluiter-Post Judith G. C.2,Westerhof Ilse1,Fourie Elandri2,Heuvelman Valerie D.3,Boom Trisja T.1,Euser Sjoerd M.4,Badoux Paul4,Reusken Chantal5,Bont Louis J.6,Sanders Elisabeth A. M.56,Jaddoe Vincent W. V.3,Herpers Bjorn L.4,Eggink Dirk5,Wildenbeest Joanne G.6,Duijts Liesbeth3,van Houten Marlies A.27,Bruijning-Verhagen Patricia C. J. L.1

Affiliation:

1. Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands

2. Spaarne Gasthuis Academy, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands

3. Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC–Sophia Children’s Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

4. Regional Public Health Laboratory Kennemerland, Haarlem, the Netherlands

5. Centre for Infectious Disease Control, World Health Organization COVID-19 Reference Laboratory, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands

6. Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands

7. Department of Pediatrics, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, the Netherlands

Abstract

ImportanceIn the early COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 testing was only accessible and recommended for symptomatic persons or adults. This restriction hampered assessment of the true incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children as well as detailed characterization of the SARS-CoV-2 disease spectrum and how this spectrum compared with that of other common respiratory illnesses.ObjectiveTo estimate the community incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and parents and to assess the symptoms and symptom severity of respiratory illness episodes involving SARS-CoV-2–positive test results relative to those with SARS-CoV-2–negative test results.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study randomly selected Dutch households with at least 1 child younger than 18 years. A total of 1209 children and adults from 307 households were prospectively followed up between August 25, 2020, and July 29, 2021, covering the second and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Participation included SARS-CoV-2 screening at 4- to 6-week intervals during the first 23 weeks of participation (core study period; August 25, 2020, to July 29, 2021). Participants in all households finishing the core study before July 1, 2021, were invited to participate in the extended follow-up and to actively report respiratory symptoms using an interactive app until July 1, 2021. At new onset of respiratory symptoms or a SARS-CoV-2 positive test result, a household outbreak study was initiated, which included daily symptom recording, repeated polymerase chain reaction testing (nose-throat swabs and saliva and fecal samples), and SARS-CoV-2 antibody measurement (paired dried blood spots) in all household members. Outbreaks, households, and episodes of respiratory illness were described as positive or negative depending on SARS-CoV-2 test results. Data on participant race and ethnicity were not reported because they were not uniformly collected in the original cohorts and were therefore not representative or informative.ExposuresSARS-CoV-2–positive and SARS-CoV-2–negative respiratory illness episodes.Main Outcomes and MeasuresAge-stratified incidence rates, symptoms, and symptom severity for SARS-CoV-2–positive and SARS-CoV-2–negative respiratory illness episodes.ResultsAmong 307 households including 1209 participants (638 female [52.8%]; 403 [33.3%] aged <12 years, 179 [14.8%] aged 12-17 years, and 627 [51.9%] aged ≥18 years), 183 household outbreaks of respiratory illness were observed during the core study and extended follow-up period, of which 63 (34.4%) were SARS-CoV-2 positive (59 outbreaks [32.2%] during the core study and 4 outbreaks [2.2%] during follow-up). SARS-CoV-2 incidence was similar across all ages (0.24/person-year [PY]; 95% CI, 0.21-0.28/PY). Overall, 33 of 134 confirmed SARS-CoV-2 episodes (24.6%) were asymptomatic. The incidence of SARS-CoV-2–negative respiratory illness episodes was highest in children younger than 12 years (0.94/PY; 95% CI, 0.89-0.97/PY). When comparing SARS-CoV-2–positive vs SARS-CoV-2–negative respiratory illness episodes in children younger than 12 years, no differences were observed in number of symptoms (median [IQR], 2 [2-4] for both groups), symptom severity (median [IQR] maximum symptom severity score, 6 [4-9] vs 7 [6-13]), or symptom duration (median [IQR], 6 [5-12] days vs 8 [4-13] days). However, among adults, SARS-CoV-2–positive episodes had a significantly higher number (median [IQR], 6 [4-8] vs 3 [2-4]), severity (median [IQR] maximum symptom severity score, 15 [9-19] vs 7 [6-11]), and duration (median [IQR] 13 [8-29] days vs 5 [3-11] days; P < .001 for all comparisons) of symptoms vs SARS-CoV-2–negative episodes.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, during the first pandemic year when mostly partial or full in-person learning occurred, the SARS-CoV-2 incidence rate in children was substantially higher than estimated from routine testing or seroprevalence data and was similar to that of adult household members. Unlike in unvaccinated adults, SARS-CoV-2 symptoms and symptom severity in children were similar to other common respiratory illnesses. These findings may prove useful when developing pediatric COVID-19 vaccine recommendations.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3