Inpatient EHR User Experience and Hospital EHR Safety Performance

Author:

Classen David C.12,Longhurst Christopher A.34,Davis Taylor5,Milstein Julia Adler6,Bates David W.78

Affiliation:

1. Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City

2. IDEAS Center, VA Salt Lake City Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, Utah

3. Department of Medicine, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, California

4. Department of Pediatrics, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, California

5. KLAS Enterprises, LLC, Orem, Utah

6. University of California San Francisco Center for Clinical Informatics and Improvement Research, San Francisco

7. Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

8. Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

IMPORTANCEDespite the broad adoption and optimization of electronic health record (EHR) systems across the continuum of care, serious usability and safety problems persist.OBJECTIVETo assess whether EHR safety performance is associated with EHR frontline user experience in a national sample of hospitals.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis cross-sectional study included all US adult hospitals that used the National Quality Forum Leapfrog Health IT Safety Measure and also used the ARCH Collaborative EHR User experience survey from January 1, 2017, to January 1, 2019. Data analysis was performed from September 2020 to November 2022.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary outcomes were hospital performance on the Leapfrog Health IT Safety measure (overall and 10 subcomponents) and the ARCH collaborative frontline user experience scores (overall and 8 subcomponents). Ordinary least squares models with survey responses clustered by hospital were used to assess associations between the overall measures and their subcomponents.RESULTSThere were 112 hospitals and 5689 frontline user surveys included in the study. Hospitals scored a mean of 0.673 (range, 0.297-0.973) on the Leapfrog Health IT safety measure; the mean ARCH EHR user experience score was 3.377 (range, 1 [best] to 5 [worst]). The adjusted β coefficient between the overall safety score and overall user experience score was 0.011 (95% CI, 0.006-0.016). The ARCH overall score was also significantly associated with 10 subcategory scores of the Leapfrog Health IT safety score, and the overall Leapfrog score was associated with the 8 subcategory scores of the ARCH user experience score.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEThis cross-sectional study found a positive association between frontline user–rated EHR usability and EHR safety performance. This finding suggests that improving EHR usability, which is a current well-known pain point for EHR users, could have direct benefits in terms of improved EHR safety.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3