Comparison of Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Author:

Hedberg Suzanne12,Thorell Anders34,Österberg Johanna56,Peltonen Markku7,Andersson Ellen89,Näslund Erik3,Hertel Jens Kristoffer10,Svanevik Marius1011,Stenberg Erik12,Neovius Martin13,Näslund Ingmar12,Wirén Mikael34,Ottosson Johan12,Olbers Torsten8914, ,Laurenius Anna15,Torgersson Jarl15

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

2. Department of Surgery (Östra Sjukhuset), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden

3. Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

4. Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

5. Department of Surgery, Mora Hospital, Mora, Sweden

6. Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

7. Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland

8. Department of Surgery, Vrinnevi Hospital, Norrköping, Sweden

9. Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

10. Department of Endocrinology, Obesity, and Nutrition, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway

11. Department of Surgery, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway

12. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden

13. Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

14. Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

15. for the BEST Study Group

Abstract

ImportanceLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are widely used bariatric procedures for which comparative efficacy and safety remain unclear.ObjectiveTo compare perioperative outcomes in SG and RYGB.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this registry-based, multicenter randomized clinical trial (Bypass Equipoise Sleeve Trial), baseline and perioperative data for patients undergoing bariatric surgery from October 6, 2015, to March 31, 2022, were analyzed. Patients were from university, regional, county, and private hospitals in Sweden (n = 20) and Norway (n = 3). Adults (aged ≥18 years) eligible for bariatric surgery with body mass indexes (BMIs; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 35 to 50 were studied.InterventionsLaparoscopic SG or RYGB.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPerioperative complications were analyzed as all adverse events and serious adverse events (Clavien-Dindo grade >IIIb). Ninety-day mortality was also assessed.ResultsA total of 1735 of 14 182 eligible patients (12%; 1282 [73.9%] female; mean (SD) age, 42.9 [11.1] years; mean [SD] BMI, 40.8 [3.7]) were included in the study. Patients were randomized and underwent SG (n = 878) or RYGB (n = 857). The mean (SD) operating time was shorter in those undergoing SG vs RYGB (47 [18] vs 68 [25] minutes; P < .001). The median (IQR) postoperative hospital stay was 1 (1-1) day in both groups. The 30-day readmission rate was 3.1% after SG and 4.0% after RYGB (P = .33). There was no 90-day mortality. The 30-day incidence of any adverse event was 40 (4.6%) and 54 (6.3%) in the SG and RYGB groups, respectively (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.47-1.08; P = .11). Corresponding figures for serious adverse events were 15 (1.7%) for the SG group and 23 (2.7%) for the RYGB group (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.33-1.22; P = .19).Conclusions and RelevanceThis randomized clinical trial of 1735 patients undergoing primary bariatric surgery found that both SG and RYGB were performed with a low perioperative risk without clinically significant differences between groups.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02767505

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3