Intraoperative Blood Management Strategies for Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery
-
Published:2023-12-28
Issue:12
Volume:6
Page:e2349559
-
ISSN:2574-3805
-
Container-title:JAMA Network Open
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JAMA Netw Open
Author:
Lenet Tori12, McIsaac Daniel I.23, Hallet Julie H.45, Jerath Angela6, Lalu Manoj M.3, Nicholls Stuart G.2, Presseau Justin2, Tinmouth Alan78, Verret Michael29, Wherrett Christopher G.3, Fergusson Dean A.278, Martel Guillaume12, Aucoin Sylvie10, Auer Rebecca10, Bartoszko Justyna10, Blitz Jeanna10, Breau Rodney10, Callum Jeannie10, Carrier François10, Carson Jeffrey10, Chow Lorraine10, Ferraris Victor10, Flexman Alana10, Foss Nicolai10, Frank Steven10, Grocott Hilary10, Jones Philip10, Karanicolas Paul10, McCluskey Stuart10, Meybohm Patrick10, Murphy Michael10, Napolitano Lena10, Ness Paul10, Palmer Antony10, Pawlik Timothy10, Prescott Lauren10, Richards Toby10, So-Osman Cynthia10, Spence Jessica10, Turgeon Alexis10, Waters Jonathan10, Wood Erica10,
Affiliation:
1. Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 2. Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 3. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 4. Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 5. Division of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre–Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 6. Department of Anesthesia, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 7. Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 8. Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 9. Department of Anesthesia, CHU de Québec–Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada 10. for the Ottawa Consensus on Intraoperative Patient Blood Management
Abstract
ImportanceThere is marked variability in red blood cell (RBC) transfusion during the intraoperative period. The development and implementation of existing clinical practice guidelines have been ineffective in reducing this variability.ObjectiveTo develop an internationally endorsed consensus statement about intraoperative transfusion in major noncardiac surgery.Evidence ReviewA Delphi consensus survey technique with an anonymous 3-round iterative rating and feedback process was used. An expert panel of surgeons, anesthesiologists, and transfusion medicine specialists was recruited internationally. Statements were informed by extensive preparatory work, including a systematic reviews of intraoperative RBC guidelines and clinical trials, an interview study with patients to explore their perspectives about intraoperative transfusion, and interviews with physicians to understand the various behaviors that influence intraoperative transfusion decision-making. Thirty-eight statements were developed addressing (1) decision-making (interprofessional communication, clinical factors, procedural considerations, and audits), (2) restrictive transfusion strategies, (3) patient-centred considerations, and (4) research considerations (equipoise, outcomes, and protocol suspension). Panelists were asked to score statements on a 7-point Likert scale. Consensus was established with at least 75% agreement.FindingsThe 34-member expert panel (14 of 33 women [42%]) included 16 anesthesiologists, 11 surgeons, and 7 transfusion specialists; panelists had a median of 16 years’ experience (range, 2-50 years), mainly in Canada (52% [17 of 33]), the US (27% [9 of 33]), and Europe (15% [5 of 33]). The panel recommended routine preoperative and intraoperative discussion between surgeons and anesthesiologists about intraoperative RBC transfusion as well as postoperative review of intraoperative transfusion events. Point-of-care hemoglobin testing devices were recommended for transfusion guidance, alongside an algorithmic transfusion protocol with a restrictive hemoglobin trigger; however, more research is needed to evaluate the use of restrictive triggers in the operating room. Expert consensus recommended a detailed preoperative consent discussion with patients of the risks and benefits of both anemia and RBC transfusion and routine disclosure of intraoperative transfusion. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were recommended as the most relevant outcomes associated with intraoperative RBC transfusion, and transfusion triggers of 70 and 90 g/L were considered acceptable hemoglobin triggers to evaluate restrictive and liberal transfusion strategies, respectively, in clinical trials.Conclusions and RelevanceThis consensus statement offers internationally endorsed expert guidance across several key domains on intraoperative RBC transfusion practice for noncardiac surgical procedures for which patients are at medium or high risk of bleeding. Future work should emphasize knowledge translation strategies to integrate these recommendations into routine clinical practice and transfusion research activities.
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Reference48 articles.
1. The top 20 surgical procedures associated with the highest risk for blood transfusion.;Montroy;Br J Surg,2020 2. Anemia in the preoperative patient.;Patel;Med Clin North Am,2009 3. Where does blood go? prospective observational study of red cell transfusion in north England.;Wells;BMJ,2002 4. Modifying physicians’ transfusion practice.;Eisenstaedt;Transfus Med Rev,1997 5. Transfusion practice in central Virginia.;Cook;Transfusion,1991
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|