Hip Fracture Risk Assessment Tools for Adults Aged 80 Years and Older

Author:

Ensrud Kristine E.123,Schousboe John T.45,Crandall Carolyn J.6,Leslie William D.7,Fink Howard A.1238,Cawthon Peggy M.9,Kado Deborah M.1011,Lane Nancy E.12,Cauley Jane A.13,Langsetmo Lisa23

Affiliation:

1. Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

2. Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

3. Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota

4. HealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota

5. Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

6. Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles

7. Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

8. Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota

9. California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco

10. Department of Medicine, Stanford University, California

11. Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Palo Alto, California

12. Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento

13. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Abstract

ImportanceWhile adults aged 80 years and older account for 70% of hip fractures in the US, performance of fracture risk assessment tools in this population is uncertain.ObjectiveTo compare performance of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator, and femoral neck bone mineral density (FNBMD) alone in 5-year hip fracture prediction.Design, Setting and ParticipantsPrognostic analysis of 3 prospective cohort studies including participants attending an index examination (1997 to 2016) at age 80 years or older. Data were analyzed from March 2023 to April 2024.Main Outcomes and MeasuresParticipants contacted every 4 or 6 months after index examination to ascertain incident hip fractures and vital status. Predicted 5-year hip fracture probabilities calculated using FRAX and Garvan models incorporating FNBMD and FNBMD alone. Model discrimination assessed by area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Model calibration assessed by comparing observed vs predicted hip fracture probabilities within predicted risk quintiles.ResultsA total of 8890 participants were included, with a mean (SD) age at index examination of 82.6 (2.7) years; 4906 participants (55.2%) were women, 866 (9.7%) were Black, 7836 (88.1%) were White, and 188 (2.1%) were other races and ethnicities. During 5-year follow-up, 321 women (6.5%) and 123 men (3.1%) experienced a hip fracture; 818 women (16.7%) and 921 men (23.1%) died before hip fracture. Among women, AUC was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.67-0.72) for FRAX, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.66-0.72) for Garvan, and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69-0.75) for FNBMD alone (FNBMD superior to FRAX, P = .01; and Garvan, P = .01). Among men, AUC was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.66-0.75) for FRAX, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72-0.81) for Garvan, and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.72-0.81) for FNBMD alone (P < .001 Garvan and FNBMD alone superior to FRAX). Among both sexes, Garvan greatly overestimated hip fracture risk among individuals in upper quintiles of predicted risk, while FRAX modestly underestimated risk among those in intermediate quintiles of predicted risk.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this prognostic study of adults aged 80 years and older, FRAX and Garvan tools incorporating FNBMD compared with FNBMD alone did not improve 5-year hip fracture discrimination. FRAX modestly underpredicted observed hip fracture probability in intermediate-risk individuals. Garvan markedly overpredicted observed hip fracture probability in high-risk individuals. Until better prediction tools are available, clinicians should prioritize consideration of hip BMD, life expectancy, and patient preferences in decision-making regarding drug treatment initiation for hip fracture prevention in late-life adults.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3