Association of Parental Status and Gender With Burden of Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards Among Oncology Physicians

Author:

Chau Brittney L.1,LaGuardia Jonnby S.2,Kim Sungjin3,Zhang Samuel C.4,Pletcher Eric5,Sanford Nina N.6,Raldow Ann C.7,Singer Lisa8,Gong Jun9,Padda Sukhmani K.9,Kamrava Mitchell4,Cohen Tara5,Mitra Devarati10,Atkins Katelyn M.4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, New York Medical College, New York, New York

2. Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York

3. Biostatistics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

5. Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

6. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas

7. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles

8. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco

9. Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

10. Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

Abstract

ImportanceTumor boards are integral to the care of patients with cancer. However, data investigating the burden of tumor boards on physicians are limited.ObjectiveTo investigate what physician-related and tumor board–related factors are associated with higher tumor board burden among oncology physicians.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsTumor board burden was assessed by a cross-sectional convenience survey posted on social media and by email to Cedars-Sinai Medical Center cancer physicians between March 3 and April 3, 2022. Tumor board start times were independently collected by email from 22 top cancer centers.Main Outcomes and MeasuresTumor board burden was measured on a 4-point scale (1, not at all burdensome; 2, slightly burdensome; 3, moderately burdensome; and 4, very burdensome). Univariable and multivariable probabilistic index (PI) models were performed.ResultsSurveys were completed by 111 physicians (median age, 42 years [IQR, 36-50 years]; 58 women [52.3%]; 60 non-Hispanic White [54.1%]). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with higher probability of tumor board burden included radiology or pathology specialty (PI, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54-0.79; P = .02), attending 3 or more hours per week of tumor boards (PI, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.58-0.76; P < .001), and having 2 or more children (PI, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.77; P = .03). Early or late tumor boards (before 8 am or at 5 pm or after) were considered very burdensome by 33 respondents (29.7%). Parents frequently reported a negative burden on childcare (43 of 77 [55.8%]) and family dynamics (49 of 77 [63.6%]). On multivariable analysis, a higher level of burden from early or late tumor boards was independently associated with identifying as a woman (PI, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57-0.78; P = .003) and having children (PI, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.84; P < .001). Independent assessment of 358 tumor boards from 22 institutions revealed the most common start time was before 8 am (88 [24.6%]).Conclusions and RelevanceThis survey study of tumor board burden suggests that identifying as a woman or parent was independently associated with a higher level of burden from early or late tumor boards. The burden of early or late tumor boards on childcare and family dynamics was commonly reported by parents. Having 2 or more children, attending 3 or more hours per week of tumor boards, and radiology or pathology specialty were associated with a significantly higher tumor board burden overall. Future strategies should aim to decrease the disparate burden on parents and women.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference37 articles.

1. The impact of tumor board on cancer care: evidence from an umbrella review.;Specchia;BMC Health Serv Res,2020

2. Digital tumor board solutions have significant impact on case preparation.;Hammer;JCO Clin Cancer Inform,2020

3. Tumor boards: optimizing the structure and improving efficiency of multidisciplinary management of patients with cancer worldwide.;El Saghir;Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book,2014

4. Compatibility of work and family life: survey of physicians in the Munich metropolitan area.;Lauchart;Gesundheitswesen,2019

5. Giving 200%: workplace flexibility and provider distress among female physicians.;Caperelli Gergel;J Healthc Leadersh,2022

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3