Efficacy and Safety of Esketamine for Supplemental Analgesia During Elective Cesarean Delivery

Author:

Xu Li-Li1,Wang Chun1,Deng Chun-Mei2,Dai Shao-Bing1,Zhou Qun3,Peng Yong-Bao3,Shou Hong-Yan4,Han Yin-Qiu4,Yu Jing5,Liu Chao-Hui5,Xia Feng6,Zhang Su-Qin6,Wang Dong-Xin2,Chen Xin-Zhong1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesia, Women’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China

2. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China

3. Department of Anesthesiology, Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Jiangxi Province, China

4. Department of Anesthesiology, Hangzhou Women's Hospital, Zhejiang, China

5. Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China

6. Department of Anesthesiology, Jiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, China

Abstract

ImportanceEpidural anesthesia is a primary choice for cesarean delivery, but supplemental analgesics are often required to relieve pain during uterine traction.ObjectiveTo investigate the sedative and analgesic effects of intravenous esketamine administered before childbirth via cesarean delivery with the patient under epidural anesthesia.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis multicenter, double-blind randomized clinical trial assessed 903 women 18 years or older who had full-term single pregnancy and were scheduled for elective cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia in 5 medical centers in China from September 18, 2021, to September 20, 2022.InterventionPatients were randomized to receive intravenous injection of 0.25 mg/kg of esketamine or placebo before incision.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe coprimary outcomes included scores on the numeric rating scale of pain (an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain; a difference of ≥1.65 points was clinically meaningful) and Ramsay Sedation Scale (a 6-point scale, with 1 indicating restlessness and 6 indicating deep sleep without response; a difference of ≥2 points was clinically meaningful) immediately after fetal delivery. Secondary outcomes included neonatal Apgar score assessed at 1 and 5 minutes after birth.ResultsA total of 600 women (mean [SD] age, 30.7 [4.3] years) were enrolled and randomized; all were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Immediately after fetal delivery, the score on the numeric rating scale of pain was lower with esketamine (median [IQR], 0 [0-1]) than with placebo (median [IQR], 0 [0-2]; median difference, 0; 95% CI, 0-0; P = .001), but the difference was not clinically important. The Ramsay Sedation Scale scores were higher (sedation deeper) with esketamine (median [IQR], 4 [3-4]) than with placebo (median [IQR], 2 [2-2]; median difference, 2; 95% CI, 2-2; P < .001). The neonatal Apgar scores did not differ between the 2 groups at 1 minute (median difference, 0; 95% CI, 0-0; P = .98) and at 5 minutes (median difference, 0; 95% CI, 0-0; P = .27). Transient neurologic or mental symptoms were more common in patients given esketamine (97.7% [293 of 300]) than in those given placebo (4.7% [14 of 300]; P < .001).Conclusions and RelevanceFor women undergoing cesarean delivery under epidural anesthesia, a subanesthetic dose of esketamine administered before incision produced transient analgesia and sedation but did not induce significant neonatal depression. Mental symptoms and nystagmus were common but transient. Indications and the optimal dose of esketamine in this patient population need further clarification, but study should be limited to those who require supplemental analgesia.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04548973

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3