Efficacy and Safety of Pacritinib vs Placebo for Patients With Severe COVID-19

Author:

Cafardi John1,Miller Carole2,Terebelo Howard3,Tewell Chad4,Benzaquen Sadia5,Park David6,Egan Pamela7,Lebovic Daniel8,Pettit Kristen9,Whitman Eric10,Tremblay Douglas11,Feld Jonathan11,Buckley Sarah12,Roman-Torres Karisse12,Smith Jennifer12,Craig Adam12,Mascarenhas John11

Affiliation:

1. The Carl and Edyth Lindner Center for Research and Education at The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio

2. Ascension St Agnes Cancer Institute, Baltimore, Maryland

3. Ascension St John Newland Medical Associates, Southfield, Michigan

4. Ascension Medical Group St Vincent Carmel Infectious Disease, Carmel, Indiana

5. Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

6. Providence St Jude Medical Center, Providence Medical Foundation, Fullerton, California

7. Lifespan Cancer Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence

8. Ascension St John Hospital, Detroit, Michigan

9. Bone Marrow Transplant & Leukemia Clinic, C. S. Mott Children’s Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan

10. Atlantic Health System, Morristown, New Jersey

11. Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York

12. CTI BioPharma, Seattle, Washington

Abstract

ImportanceThe morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19 remain high despite advances in standard of care therapy, and the role of anti-inflammatory agents that inhibit the interleukin 6/JAK2 pathway is still being elucidated.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of the oral JAK2/IRAK1 inhibitor pacritinib vs placebo in the treatment of adults with severe COVID-19.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial enrolled hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19 at 21 centers across the US between June 2020 and February 2021, with approximately 1.5 months of safety follow-up per patient. Data analysis was performed from September 2021 to July 2022.InterventionsPatients were randomized 1:1 to standard of care plus pacritinib (400 mg per os on day 1 followed by 200 mg twice daily on days 2-14) vs placebo, for 14 days.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was death or need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) by day 28. All-cause mortality and safety were also assessed.ResultsA total of 200 patients were randomized to pacritinib (99 patients; 56 men [56.6%]; median [range] age, 60 [19-87] years) or placebo (101 patients; 64 men [63.4%]; median [range] age 59 [28-94] years). The percentage requiring supplementary oxygen was 99.0% (98 patients) in the pacritinib group vs 98.0% (99 patients) in the placebo group. The percentage who progressed to IMV, ECMO, or death was 17.2% (17 patients) in the pacritinib group vs 22.8% (23 patients) in the placebo group (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.28-1.35; P = .23). Among patients with elevated interleukin 6, the rate was 17.5% (11 of 63 patients) in the pacritinib group vs 30.4% (21 of 96 patients) in the placebo group. The adverse event rate was similar for pacritinib vs placebo (78.1% [75 patients] vs 80.2% [81 patients]), with no excess in infection (14.6% [14 patients] vs 19.8% [20 patients]), bleeding (8.3% [8 patients] vs 10.9% [11 patients]), or thrombosis (8.3% [8 patients] vs 7.9% [8 patients]). Rates of grade 3 or higher adverse events were lower with pacritinib than placebo (29.2% [28 patients] vs 40.6% [41 patients]).Conclusions and RelevanceThe study did not meet its primary end point in patients with severe COVID-19. Subgroup analyses may indicate specific populations with hyperinflammation that could benefit from pacritinib, although further clinical trials would be needed to confirm these effects.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04404361

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3