Association of Funding Cuts to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Navigator Program With Privately Sponsored Television Advertising

Author:

Myerson Rebecca1,Anderson David M.23,Baum Laura M.4,Fowler Erika Franklin45,Gollust Sarah E.6,Shafer Paul R.7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison

2. Duke Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

3. Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

4. Wesleyan Media Project, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut

5. Department of Government, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut

6. Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

7. Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

ImportanceMany individuals eligible for coverage in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace remain unenrolled because of information barriers. Whether the private sector or the public sector should conduct outreach to address these barriers is a topic of active debate.ObjectiveTo determine whether cuts to the funding of the ACA navigator program were associated with changes in the volume of private sector advertising.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsUsing data from the 2015 to 2019 open enrollment periods, this economic evaluation analyzed the changes in advertising associated with 2017 to 2019 cuts to navigator program funding. A difference-in-difference analysis was used to compare outcomes before and after the cuts in counties with higher and lower exposure to the navigator program. Health insurance advertising was measured using data from Kantar/Campaign Media Analysis Group in collaboration with the Wesleyan Media Project, the most comprehensive data available on local broadcast and national cable advertising. The data set included all counties that met the eligibility criteria for the navigator program from 2015 through 2019. Data were analyzed from August 2021 to May 2022.ExposuresCounties were classified as having higher or lower exposure to the navigator program according to the intensity of program activity in 2016, before the funding cuts. Counties served only by statewide navigator programs were categorized as lower exposure, while those also served by local navigator programs were categorized as higher exposure.Main Outcomes and MeasuresNumber of privately sponsored television advertisement airings for the ACA individual health insurance marketplace during the 2015 to 2019 open enrollment periods in each county, adjusted for population.ResultsAll counties in 33 states that met the eligibility criteria for the navigator program from 2015 through 2019 were included in the analysis (2435 counties). Cuts to the navigator program were not associated with changes in the number of privately sponsored health insurance advertisements aired. Results were similar under several alternative approaches including an event study specification.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study of the association between television advertising and navigator funding in the ACA marketplaces, private sector entities did not increase their advertising to compensate for declines in government-sponsored navigator activity. This finding can inform policy debates about the extent to which the private sector adjusts in response to changes in government outreach, and thus improve the design of state waivers and federal funding allocations.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference58 articles.

1. Local television news coverage of the Affordable Care Act: emphasizing politics over consumer information.;Gollust;Am J Public Health,2017

2. Preparedness of Americans for the Affordable Care Act.;Barcellos;Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,2014

3. Knowledge as a predictor of insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act.;Hoerl;Med Care,2017

4. Factors affecting health insurance enrollment through the state marketplaces: observations on the ACA’s third open enrollment period.;Giovannelli;Issue Brief (Commonw Fund),2016

5. Marketplace plans with narrow physician networks feature lower monthly premiums than plans with larger networks.;Polsky;Health Aff (Millwood),2016

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The effects of state-managed marketplaces on out-of-pocket health care costs: Before and after the Affordable Care Act;Research in Social Stratification and Mobility;2024-02

2. Error in Figure;JAMA Network Open;2022-09-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3