Virtual Visits With Own Family Physician vs Outside Family Physician and Emergency Department Use

Author:

Lapointe-Shaw Lauren12345,Salahub Christine1,Austin Peter C.236,Bai Li2,Bhatia R. Sacha47,Bird Cherryl8,Glazier Richard H.23910,Hedden Lindsay11,Ivers Noah M.2351213,Martin Danielle3912,Shuldiner Jennifer5,Spithoff Sheryl912,Tadrous Mina251314,Kiran Tara2391015

Affiliation:

1. University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

2. ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

4. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

5. Women’s College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

6. Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

7. Department of Cardiology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

8. Patient Partner, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

9. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

10. MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

11. Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

12. Department of Family Medicine, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

13. Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

14. Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

15. Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

ImportanceVirtual visits became more common after the COVID-19 pandemic, but it is unclear in what context they are best used.ObjectiveTo investigate whether there was a difference in subsequent emergency department use between patients who had a virtual visit with their own family physician vs those who had virtual visits with an outside physician.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis propensity score–matched cohort study was conducted among all Ontario residents attached to a family physician as of April 1, 2021, who had a virtual family physician visit in the subsequent year (to March 31, 2022).ExposureThe type of virtual family physician visit, with own or outside physician, was determined. In a secondary analysis, own physician visits were compared with visits with a physician working in direct-to-consumer telemedicine.Main Outcome and MeasureThe primary outcome was an emergency department visit within 7 days after the virtual visit.ResultsAmong 5 229 240 Ontario residents with a family physician and virtual visit, 4 173 869 patients (79.8%) had a virtual encounter with their own physician (mean [SD] age, 49.3 [21.5] years; 2 420 712 females [58.0%]) and 1 055 371 patients (20.2%) had an encounter with an outside physician (mean [SD] age, 41.8 [20.9] years; 605 614 females [57.4%]). In the matched cohort of 1 885 966 patients, those who saw an outside physician were 66% more likely to visit an emergency department within 7 days than those who had a virtual visit with their own physician (30 748 of 942 983 patients [3.3%] vs 18 519 of 942 983 patients [2.0%]; risk difference, 1.3% [95% CI, 1.2%-1.3%]; relative risk, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.63-1.69]). The increase in the risk of emergency department visits was greater when comparing 30 216 patients with definite direct-to-consumer telemedicine visits with 30 216 patients with own physician visits (risk difference, 4.1% [95% CI, 3.8%-4.5%]; relative risk, 2.99 [95% CI, 2.74-3.27]).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, patients whose virtual visit was with an outside physician were more likely to visit an emergency department in the next 7 days than those whose virtual visit was with their own family physician. These findings suggest that primary care virtual visits may be best used within an existing clinical relationship.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3