Adjuvant Everolimus in Non–Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Author:

Gulati Shuchi1,Tangen Catherine2,Ryan Christopher W.3,Vaishampayan Ulka N.4,Shuch Brian M.5,Barata Pedro C.6,Pruthi Deepak K.7,Bergerot Cristiane D.8,Tripathi Abhishek9,Lerner Seth P.10,Thompson Ian M.11,Lara Primo N.1,Pal Sumanta K.9

Affiliation:

1. University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento

2. SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, Washington

3. Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland

4. Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

5. University of California, Los Angeles

6. University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio

7. University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio

8. Oncoclinicas, Brasilia, Brazil

9. City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California

10. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

11. CHRISTUS Medical Center Hospital, San Antonio, Texas

Abstract

ImportanceClinical trial data on adjuvant therapy in patients with non–clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are scant.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of adjuvant everolimus after nephrectomy on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with localized papillary and chromophobe RCC.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis prespecified subgroup analysis of a phase 3 randomized clinical trial, EVEREST, included patients enrolled between April 1, 2011, and September 15, 2016. Eligible patients had fully resected RCC at intermediate-high risk (pT1 grade 3-4, N0 to pT3a grade 1-2, N0) or very-high risk (pT3a grade 3-4 to pT4 any grade or N+) for recurrence who had received radical or partial nephrectomy. Final analyses was completed in March 2022.InterventionThe intervention group received 54 weeks of everolimus (10 mg orally daily); the control group received a matching placebo.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcomes were RFS, OS, and rates of adverse events. For testing the hazard ratio (HR) for treatment effect, a Cox regression model was used for both OS and RFS.ResultsOf 1545 adult patients with treatment-naive, nonmetastatic, fully resected RCC in EVEREST, 109 had papillary RCC (median [range] age, 60 [19-81] years; 82 [75%] male; 50 patients [46%] with very high–risk disease) and 99 had chromophobe RCC (median [range] age 51 [18-71] years; 53 [54%] male; 34 patients [34%] with very high–risk disease). Among 57 patients with papillary RCC in the intervention group, 26 (46%) completed 54 weeks of treatment, and among 53 patients with chromophobe RCC in the intervention group, 26 (49%) completed 54 weeks of treatment. With a median (IQR) follow-up of 76 (61-96) months, adjuvant everolimus did not improve RFS compared with placebo in either papillary RCC (5-year RFS: 62% vs 70%; HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.61-2.33; P = .61) or chromophobe RCC (5-year RFS: 79% vs 77%; HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.37-2.13; P = .79). In the combined non–clear RCC cohort, grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 48% of patients who received everolimus and 9% of patients who received placebo.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this clinical trial assessing the use of adjuvant everolimus, postoperative everolimus did not show evidence of improved RFS among patients with papillary or chromophobe RCC, and results from the study do not support adjuvant everolimus for this cohort. However, since the lower bounds of the 95% CIs were 0.61 and 0.89, respectively, potential treatment benefit in these subgroups cannot be ruled out.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01120249

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3