Factors Associated With Quality-of-Dying-and-Death Classes Among Critically Ill Patients

Author:

Wen Fur-Hsing1,Chou Wen-Chi23,Huang Chung-Chi45,Hu Tsung-Hui6,Chuang Li-Pang4,Tang Siew Tzuh2789

Affiliation:

1. Department of International Business, Soochow University, Taiwan, R.O.C.

2. Division of Hematology-Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, R.O.C.

3. College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, R.O.C.

4. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, R.O.C.

5. Department of Respiratory Therapy, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, R.O.C.

6. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C.

7. Department of Nursing, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Kaohsiung, R.O.C.

8. School of Nursing, Medical College, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, R.O.C.

9. Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Abstract

ImportanceImproving end-of-life care in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a priority, but clinically modifiable factors of quality of dying and death (QODD) are seldom identified.ObjectivesTo comprehensively identify factors associated with QODD classes of dying ICU patients, emphasizing clinically modifiable factors based on the integrative framework of factors associated with for bereavement outcomes.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis observational cohort study was conducted at medical ICUs of 2 Taiwanese medical centers from January 2018 to March 2020 with follow-up through December 2022. Eligible participants included primary family surrogates responsible for decision making for critically ill ICU patients at high risk of death (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score >20) but who survived more than 3 days after ICU admission. Data analysis was conducted from July to September 2023.Main Outcomes and MeasuresQODD was measured by the 23-item ICU-QODD questionnaire. Factors associated with patient membership in 4 previously determined QODD classes (high, moderate, poor to uncertain, and worst) were examined using a 3-step approach for latent class modeling with the high QODD class as the reference category.ResultsA total of 309 family surrogates (mean [SD] age, 49.83 [12.55] years; 184 women [59.5%] and 125 men [40.5%]) were included in the study. Of all surrogates, 91 (29.4%) were the patients’ spouse and 66 (53.7%) were the patients’ adult child. Patient demographics were not associated with QODD class. Two family demographics (age and gender), relationship with the patient (spousal or adult-child), and length of ICU stay were associated with QODD classes. Patients of surrogates perceiving greater social support were less likely to be in the poor to uncertain (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.94) and worst (aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87-0.96) QODD classes. Family meetings were associated with the poor to uncertain QODD class (aOR, 8.61; 95% CI, 2.49-29.74) and worst QODD class (aOR, 7.28; 95% CI, 1.37-38.71). Death with cardiopulmonary resuscitation was associated with the worst QODD class (aOR, 7.51; 95% CI, 1.12-50.25). Family presence at patient death was uniformly negatively associated with the moderate QODD class (aOR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05-0.54), poor to uncertain QODD class (aOR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.05-0.82), and worst QODD class (aOR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.38). Higher family satisfaction with ICU care was negatively associated with the poor to uncertain QODD class (aOR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.98) and worst QODD class (aOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.81-0.92).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study of critically ill patients and their family surrogates, modifiable end-of-life ICU-care characteristics played a more significant role in associations with patient QODD class than did immutable family demographics, preexisting family health conditions, patient demographics, and patient clinical characteristics, thereby illuminating actionable opportunities to improve end-of-life ICU care.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3