Affiliation:
1. Division of Critical Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
2. Max Harry Weil Institute for Critical Care Research and Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan
3. Department of Critical Care, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
4. Department of Emergency Medicine and Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
5. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
6. Clinical Financial Planning & Analysis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Abstract
ImportanceValue in health care is quality per unit cost (V = Q/C), and an emergency department–based intensive care unit (ED-ICU) model has been associated with improved quality. To assess the value of this care delivery model, it is essential to determine the incremental direct cost of care.ObjectiveTo determine the association of an ED-ICU with inflation-adjusted change in mean direct cost of care, net revenue, and direct margin per ED patient encounter.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective economic analysis evaluated the cost of care delivery to patients in the ED before and after deployment of the Joyce and Don Massey Family Foundation Emergency Critical Care Center, an ED-ICU, on February 16, 2015, at a large academic medical center in the US with approximately 75 000 adult ED visits per year. The pre–ED-ICU cohort was defined as all documented ED visits by patients 18 years or older with a complete financial record from September 8, 2012, through June 30, 2014 (660 days); the post–ED-ICU cohort, all visits from July 1, 2015, through April 21, 2017 (660 days). Fiscal year 2015 was excluded from analysis to phase in the new care model. Statistical analysis was performed March 1 through December 30, 2021.ExposuresImplementation of an ED-ICU.Main Outcomes and MeasuresInflation-adjusted direct cost of care, net revenue, and direct margin per patient encounter in the ED.ResultsA total of 234 884 ED visits during the study period were analyzed, with 115 052 patients (54.7% women) in the pre–ED-ICU cohort and 119 832 patients (54.5% women) in the post–ED-ICU cohort. The post–ED-ICU cohort was older (mean [SD] age, 49.1 [19.9] vs 47.8 [19.6] years; P < .001), required more intensive respiratory support (2.2% vs 1.1%; P < .001) and more vasopressor use (0.5% vs 0.2%; P < .001), and had a higher overall case mix index (mean [SD], 1.7 [2.0] vs 1.5 [1.7]; P < .001). Implementation of the ED-ICU was associated with similar inflation-adjusted total direct cost per ED encounter (pre–ED-ICU, mean [SD], $4875 [$15 175]; post–ED-ICU, $4877 [$17 400]; P = .98). Inflation-adjusted net revenue per encounter increased by 7.0% (95% CI, 3.4%-10.6%; P < .001), and inflation-adjusted direct margin per encounter increased by 46.6% (95% CI, 32.1%-61.2%; P < .001).Conclusions and RelevanceImplementation of an ED-ICU was associated with no significant change in inflation-adjusted total direct cost per ED encounter. Holding delivery costs constant while improving quality demonstrates improved value via the ED-ICU model of care.
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献