Effectiveness of a Community-Based Structured Physical Activity Program for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

Author:

Mukherji Aishee B.1,Lu Di2,Qin FeiFei2,Hedlin Haley2,Johannsen Neil M.3,Chung Sukyung2,Kobayashi Yukari45,Haddad Francois45,Lamendola Cynthia4,Basina Marina6,Talamoa Ruth1,Myers Jonathan7,Palaniappan Latha18

Affiliation:

1. Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

2. Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

3. Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge

4. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

5. Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford, California

6. Division of Endocrinology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

7. Cardiology Division, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

8. Division of General Medical Disciplines, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

Abstract

ImportanceThe efficacy of physical activity interventions among individuals with type 2 diabetes has been established; however, practical approaches to translate and extend these findings into community settings have not been well explored.ObjectiveTo test the effectiveness of providing varying frequencies of weekly structured exercise sessions to improve diabetes control.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe IMPACT (Initiate and Maintain Physical Activity in Communities Trial) study was a controlled randomized clinical trial (randomization occurred from October 2016 to April 2019) that included a 6-month, structured exercise intervention either once or thrice weekly vs usual care (UC; advice only). The exercise intervention was conducted at community-based fitness centers. Follow-up visits were conducted in a university research clinic. Participants included adults with type 2 diabetes (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] 6.5%-13.0%, not taking insulin, and no precluding health issues). Data analysis was performed from January to April 2022.InterventionsA once-weekly structured exercise group, a thrice-weekly structured exercise group, or UC.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was HbA1c at 6 months.ResultsA total of 357 participants (143 women [40.1%]) with a mean (SD) age of 57.4 (11.1) years were randomized (119 each to the UC, once-weekly exercise, and thrice-weekly exercise groups). There was no significant difference in HbA1c change by study group in the intention-to-treat analysis at 6 months. Specifically, HbA1c changed by −0.23% (95% CI, −0.48% to 0.01%) in the thrice-weekly exercise group and by −0.16% (95% CI, −0.41% to 0.09%) in the once-weekly exercise group. A total of 62 participants (52.1%) in the once-weekly exercise group and 56 participants (47.1%) in the thrice-weekly exercise group were at least 50% adherent to the assigned structured exercise regimen and were included in the per-protocol analysis. Per-protocol analysis showed that HbA1c changed by −0.35% (95% CI, −0.60% to −0.10%; P = .005) at 3 months and by −0.38% (95% CI, −0.65% to −0.12%; P = .005) at 6 months in the thrice-weekly exercise group compared with UC. There was no significant decrease in HbA1c in the once-weekly exercise group. The exercise intervention was effective in improving self-reported minutes of metabolic equivalent tasks per week for participants in the thrice-weekly exercise group (both overall and per protocol).Conclusions and RelevanceAlthough the intervention was not effective in the intention-to-treat analysis, participants in the thrice-weekly exercise group who attended at least 50% of the sessions during the 6-month exercise intervention program improved HbA1c levels at 6 months. Future efforts should focus on improving adherence to thrice-weekly structured exercise programs to meet exercise guidelines.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02061579

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3