Enhancing Postmarketing Surveillance of Medical Products With Large Language Models

Author:

Matheny Michael E.1234,Yang Jie5,Smith Joshua C.1,Walsh Colin G.126,Al-Garadi Mohammed A.1,Davis Sharon E.1,Marsolo Keith A.7,Fabbri Daniel18,Reeves Ruth R.14,Johnson Kevin B.910,Dal Pan Gerald J.11,Ball Robert11,Desai Rishi J.5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee

2. Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee

3. Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee

4. Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Care Service, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System VA, Nashville

5. Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

6. Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee

7. Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

8. Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee

9. Department of Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

10. Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

11. Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland

Abstract

ImportanceThe Sentinel System is a key component of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) postmarketing safety surveillance commitment and uses clinical health care data to conduct analyses to inform drug labeling and safety communications, FDA advisory committee meetings, and other regulatory decisions. However, observational data are frequently deemed insufficient for reliable evaluation of safety concerns owing to limitations in underlying data or methodology. Advances in large language models (LLMs) provide new opportunities to address some of these limitations. However, careful consideration is necessary for how and where LLMs can be effectively deployed for these purposes.ObservationsLLMs may provide new avenues to support signal-identification activities to identify novel adverse event signals from narrative text of electronic health records. These algorithms may be used to support epidemiologic investigations examining the causal relationship between exposure to a medical product and an adverse event through development of probabilistic phenotyping of health outcomes of interest and extraction of information related to important confounding factors. LLMs may perform like traditional natural language processing tools by annotating text with controlled vocabularies with additional tailored training activities. LLMs offer opportunities for enhancing information extraction from adverse event reports, medical literature, and other biomedical knowledge sources. There are several challenges that must be considered when leveraging LLMs for postmarket surveillance. Prompt engineering is needed to ensure that LLM-extracted associations are accurate and specific. LLMs require extensive infrastructure to use, which many health care systems lack, and this can impact diversity, equity, and inclusion, and result in obscuring significant adverse event patterns in some populations. LLMs are known to generate nonfactual statements, which could lead to false positive signals and downstream evaluation activities by the FDA and other entities, incurring substantial cost.Conclusions and RelevanceLLMs represent a novel paradigm that may facilitate generation of information to support medical product postmarket surveillance activities that have not been possible. However, additional work is required to ensure LLMs can be used in a fair and equitable manner, minimize false positive findings, and support the necessary rigor of signal detection needed for regulatory activities.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3