Effect of a Nurse Navigation Intervention on Mental Symptoms in Patients With Psychological Vulnerability and Breast Cancer

Author:

Bidstrup Pernille Envold12,Johansen Christoffer13,Kroman Niels45,Belmonte Federica6,Duriaud Helle5,Dalton Susanne Oksbjerg78,Andersen Kenneth Geving910,Mertz Birgitte5

Affiliation:

1. Psychological Aspects of Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark

2. Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

3. Late Effect Research Unit, CASTLE, Oncology Clinic, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

4. Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark

5. Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev/Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

6. Statistics and Data Analysis, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark

7. Survivorship and Inequality in Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark

8. Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Næstved, Denmark

9. Department of Anesthesiology, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

10. Section for Surgical Pathophysiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract

ImportanceThe unmet needs regarding symptom management of psychological distress among patients with breast cancer must be addressed. However, little evidence exists on effective interventions, such as nurse navigation.ObjectiveTo compare the long-term effects of the REBECCA (Rehabilitation After Breast Cancer) nurse navigation intervention vs usual care in patients with breast cancer who were psychologically vulnerable.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis parallel randomized clinical trial recruited and evaluated for eligibility adult female patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer and symptoms of psychological distress (distress score of ≥7 points on Distress Thermometer) at Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, Denmark, from August 2017 to October 2019. This study continued the work of a pilot study, extending the follow-up to 18 months. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to either standard care or the REBECCA intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed from June 2021 to October 2022.InterventionsPatients who were randomized to the REBECCA intervention received nurse navigation and symptom screening as well as standard care. Standard care included regular treatment, nurse support at chemotherapy and radiotherapy appointments, and municipality-based rehabilitation.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was distress, as measured using the Distress Thermometer. The secondary outcomes included symptoms of anxiety, symptoms of depression, breast cancer–specific health-related quality of life, fear of recurrence, sleep, cognitive function, patient activation, pain, health behavior, body mass index, and need for support. Long-term effects at 6, 12, and 18 months were examined using mixed-effect models, adjusting for randomization strata of age and treatment modality.ResultsA total of 309 female patients were included in the analysis, with 153 patients randomized to the standard care group and 156 patients randomized to the REBECCA intervention group. Mean (SD) age was 56 (11) years with only small between-group differences. Patients receiving the REBECCA intervention compared with standard care had reduced (although not significant) symptoms of distress, especially at the 12-month follow-up (estimated effect = −0.51 [95% CI, −1.05 to 0.04]; effect size [ES] = −0.49). Significant effects were seen for symptoms of depression at 6 months (estimated effect = −1.39 [95% CI, −2.33 to −0.44]; ES = −0.27), and breast cancer–specific health-related quality of life at 12 months (estimated effect = 4.03 [95% CI, 1.28- 6.77]; ES = 0.31). Nonsignificant reductions were seen for symptoms of anxiety at 6 months (estimated effect = −1.00 [95% CI, −1.95 to −0.06]; ES = −0.21) and 12 months (estimated effect = −1.01 [95% CI, −1.97 to −0.04]; ES = −0.21), and a nonsignificant increase was seen for patient activation at 18 months (estimated effect = 3.52 [95% CI, −0.09 to 7.12]; ES = 0.25). Stronger intervention effects were observed for younger age, low patient activation, less education, and low social support.Conclusions and RelevanceResults of this study indicate that patients with breast cancer who were psychologically vulnerable (ie, having moderate to high psychological distress) did not experience significant reduction in distress with nurse navigation. Further research is needed to develop the intervention’s framework and investigate its potential use in clinical practice.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03254875

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3