Effect of Perioperative Palliative Care on Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients Undergoing Surgery for Cancer

Author:

Aslakson Rebecca A.1,Rickerson Elizabeth23,Fahy Bridget4,Waterman Brittany5,Siden Rachel6,Colborn Kathryn78,Smith Shelby8,Verano Mae6,Lira Isaac9,Hollahan Caroline2,Siddiqi Amn10,Johnson Kemba11,Chandrashekaran Shivani12,Harris Elizabeth1314,Nudotor Richard10,Baker Joshua9,Heidari Shireen N.15,Poultsides George16,Conca-Cheng Alison M.17,Cook Chapman Allyson18,Lessios Anna Sophia6,Holdsworth Laura M.6,Gustin Jillian5,Ejaz Aslam19,Pawlik Timothy19,Miller Judi20,Morris Arden M.16,Tulsky James A.221,Lorenz Karl622,Temel Jennifer S.23,Smith Thomas J.24,Johnston Fabian10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, Lerner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington

2. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts

3. Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

4. Department of Surgery, Divisions of Surgical Oncology and Palliative Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

5. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus

6. Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California

7. Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora

8. Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora

9. Clinical Research Department, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque

10. Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions Campus, Baltimore, Maryland

11. Clinical Research Center, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus

12. Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

13. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

14. Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts

15. Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

16. Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

17. Department of Pediatrics, Duke Children’s Hospital, Durham, North Carolina

18. Departments of Medicine and Surgery, University of California, San Francisco

19. Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus

20. Patient Family Advocate, Baltimore, Maryland

21. Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

22. VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California

23. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, MGH, Boston, Massachusetts

24. Departments of Medicine and Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions Campus, Baltimore, Maryland

Abstract

ImportanceInvolvement of palliative care specialists in the care of medical oncology patients has been repeatedly observed to improve patient-reported outcomes, but there is no analogous research in surgical oncology populations.ObjectiveTo determine whether surgeon–palliative care team comanagement, compared with surgeon team alone management, improves patient-reported perioperative outcomes among patients pursuing curative-intent surgery for high morbidity and mortality upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsFrom October 20, 2018, to March 31, 2022, a patient-randomized clinical trial was conducted with patients and clinicians nonblinded but the analysis team blinded to allocation. The trial was conducted in 5 geographically diverse academic medical centers in the US. Individuals pursuing curative-intent surgery for an upper GI cancer who had received no previous specialist palliative care were eligible. Surgeons were encouraged to offer participation to all eligible patients.InterventionSurgeon–palliative care comanagement patients met with palliative care either in person or via telephone before surgery, 1 week after surgery, and 1, 2, and 3 months after surgery. For patients in the surgeon-alone group, surgeons were encouraged to follow National Comprehensive Cancer Network–recommended triggers for palliative care consultation.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome of the trial was patient-reported health-related quality of life at 3 months following the operation. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported mental and physical distress. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed.ResultsIn total, 359 patients (175 [48.7%] men; mean [SD] age, 64.6 [10.7] years) were randomized to surgeon-alone (n = 177) or surgeon–palliative care comanagement (n = 182), with most patients (206 [57.4%]) undergoing pancreatic cancer surgery. No adverse events were associated with the intervention, and 11% of patients in the surgeon-alone and 90% in the surgeon–palliative care comanagement groups received palliative care consultation. There was no significant difference between study arms in outcomes at 3 months following the operation in patient-reported health-related quality of life (mean [SD], 138.54 [28.28] vs 136.90 [28.96]; P = .62), mental health (mean [SD], −0.07 [0.87] vs −0.07 [0.84]; P = .98), or overall number of deaths (6 [3.7%] vs 7 [4.1%]; P > .99).Conclusions and RelevanceTo date, this is the first multisite randomized clinical trial to evaluate perioperative palliative care and the earliest integration of palliative care into cancer care. Unlike in medical oncology practice, the data from this trial do not suggest palliative care–associated improvements in patient-reported outcomes among patients pursuing curative-intent surgeries for upper GI cancers.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03611309

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3