Designing Prefaculty Competencies for Diverse Learners Through a Modified Delphi Process

Author:

Lee Rosa12,Lucas Raymond3,Dickerman Joel4,Day Lukejohn W.56,Guzman Daniel7,Kothari Pooja8,Love LaTanya9,McDade William1011,Rodgers Ashley12,Verduzco-Gutierrez Monica13,Zhang Lindy14,Sánchez John Paul15

Affiliation:

1. Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York

2. Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York

3. George Washington University, Washington, DC

4. St Mary Corwin and St Thomas More Hospitals, Pueblo, Colorado

5. Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, California

6. Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco

7. Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York

8. Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York

9. McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

10. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois

11. Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois

12. The Children’s Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, New York

13. University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

14. Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

15. Universidad Central Del Caribe School of Medicine, Bayamón, Puerto Rico

Abstract

ImportanceFaculty diversity in academic medicine may better prepare the next generation of equity-minded health care practitioners and leaders. Prefaculty development is an emerging concept to support trainees in achieving key knowledge, skills, and experiences to become successful faculty.ObjectiveTo outline competencies, with corresponding milestones, to support the academic career development of learners, inclusive of racial, ethnic, sexual, and gender identities minoritized in medicine.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsUsing a modified Delphi process, a national working group consisting of 13 members was established. The group used the published literature and listening sessions with diverse stakeholders to draft a set of competencies and milestones in July 2022. Diverse expert panelists reviewed the draft set over 2 rounds between September 2022 and January 2023. The group considered qualitative data to further refine the draft set between rounds. Consensus was reached when competencies and milestones were rated as agree or strongly agree on importance or appropriateness by 75% or greater of expert panelists after the second round. A final set of competencies and milestones was generated in February 2023. Data from round 1 were analyzed in October 2022 and data from round 2 were analyzed in January 2023.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe development of prefaculty competencies with corresponding milestones by expert panel rankings and comments.ResultsThe national working group consisted of 13 members who represented diversity across racial, ethnic, and gender identities and academic and career tracks. The working group developed an initial set of 36 competencies and corresponding milestones across 12 domains. After 2 rounds, consensus among 46 expert panelists generated a final list of 32 competencies with corresponding milestones across 11 domains. A total of 26 panelists (56.5%) were women, 11 (23.9%) were Black or African American, 17 (37.0%) were Latina/o/x/e, Hispanic, or of Spanish origin, and 10 (21.7%) were White. Competency domains were divided into 2 groups: foundational (academic career choice and professional identity, mentorship, networking, financial skills, diversity and inclusion, personal effectiveness and self-efficacy, and leadership) and focused (education, community engagement, research, and clinical medicine). Consensus for inclusion or elimination of items was greater than 90% between the 2 rounds.Conclusions and RelevanceThere was consensus among the working group and expert panelists regarding the importance and appropriateness of the competencies and milestones for diverse trainees to successfully obtain faculty positions. Institutions and national organizations can use these competencies as a framework to develop curricula that support diverse learners’ career development toward academia.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3