Feedback and Financial Incentives for Reducing Cell Phone Use While Driving

Author:

Delgado M. Kit12345,Ebert Jeffrey P.1345,Xiong Ruiying A.346,Winston Flaura K.78,McDonald Catherine C.579,Rosin Roy M.34,Volpp Kevin G.34610,Barnett Ian J.2,Small Dylan S.2411,Wiebe Douglas J.12,Abdel-Rahman Dina134,Hemmons Jessica E.134,Finegold Rafi13,Kotrc Benjamin13,Radford Emma13,Fisher William J.14,Gaba Kristen L.14,Everett William C.14,Halpern Scott D.24610

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

2. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

3. Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

4. Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

5. Penn Injury Science Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

6. Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

7. Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia

8. Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

9. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

10. Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

11. Department of Statistics and Data Science, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

12. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

13. TrueMotion Inc (acquired by Cambridge Mobile Telematics), Cambridge, Massachusetts

14. The Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Mayfield Village, Ohio

Abstract

ImportanceHandheld phone use while driving is a major factor in vehicle crashes. Scalable interventions are needed to encourage drivers not to use their phones.ObjectiveTo test whether interventions involving social comparison feedback and/or financial incentives can reduce drivers’ handheld phone use.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn a randomized clinical trial, interventions were administered nationwide in the US via a mobile application in the context of a usage-based insurance program (Snapshot Mobile application). Customers were eligible to be invited to participate in the study if enrolled in the usage-based insurance program for 30 to 70 days. The study was conducted from May 13 to June 30, 2019. Analysis was completed December 22, 2023.InterventionsParticipants were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 trial arms for a 7-week intervention period: (1) control; (2) feedback, with weekly push notification about their handheld phone use compared with that of similar others; (3) standard incentive, with a maximum $50 award at the end of the intervention based on how their handheld phone use compared with similar others; (4) standard incentive plus feedback, combining interventions of arms 2 and 3; (5) reframed incentive plus feedback, with a maximum $7.15 award each week, framed as participant’s to lose; and (6) doubled reframed incentive plus feedback, a maximum $14.29 weekly loss-framed award.Main Outcome and MeasureProportion of drive time engaged in handheld phone use in seconds per hour (s/h) of driving. Analyses were conducted with the intention-to-treat approach.ResultsOf 17 663 customers invited by email to participate, 2109 opted in and were randomized. A total of 2020 drivers finished the intervention period (68.0% female; median age, 30 [IQR, 25-39] years). Median baseline handheld phone use was 216 (IQR, 72-480) s/h. Relative to control, feedback and standard incentive participants did not reduce their handheld phone use. Standard incentive plus feedback participants reduced their use by −38 (95% CI, −69 to −8) s/h (P = .045); reframed incentive plus feedback participants reduced their use by −56 (95% CI, −87 to −26) s/h (P < .001); and doubled reframed incentive plus feedback participants reduced their use by −42 s/h (95% CI, −72 to −13 s/h; P = .007). The 5 active treatment arms did not differ significantly from each other.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized clinical trial, providing social comparison feedback plus incentives reduced handheld phone use while individuals were driving.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03833219

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3