Efficacy of a Commercial Weight Management Program Compared With a Do-It-Yourself Approach

Author:

Tate Deborah F.123,Lutes Lesley D.4,Bryant Maria56,Truesdale Kimberly P.1,Hatley Karen E.3,Griffiths Zoe7,Tang Tricia S.8,Padgett Louise D.5,Pinto Angela M.9,Stevens June110,Foster Gary D.1112

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

2. Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

3. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

4. Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

5. Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom

6. The Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, United Kingdom

7. WW, New York, New York

8. Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Campus, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

9. Department of Psychology, Baruch College/City University of New York, New York

10. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

11. Center for Weight and Eating Disorders, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

12. WW, Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK

Abstract

ImportanceGiven the prevalence of obesity, accessible and effective treatment options are needed to manage obesity and its comorbid conditions. Commercial weight management programs are a potential solution to the lack of available treatment, providing greater access at lower cost than clinic-based approaches, but few commercial programs have been rigorously evaluated.ObjectiveTo compare the differences in weight change between individuals randomly assigned to a commercial weight management program and those randomly assigned to a do-it-yourself (DIY) approach.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis 1-year, randomized clinical trial conducted in the United States, Canada, and United Kingdom between June 19, 2018, and November 30, 2019, enrolled 373 adults aged 18 to 75 years with a body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 25 to 45. Assessors were blinded to treatment conditions.InterventionsA widely available commercial weight management program that included reduced requirements for dietary self-monitoring and recommendations for a variety of DIY approaches to weight loss.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were the difference in weight change between the 2 groups at 3 and 12 months. The a priori hypothesis was that the commercial program would result in greater weight loss than the DIY approach at 3 and 12 months. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis.ResultsThe study include 373 participants (272 women [72.9%]; mean [SD] BMI, 33.8 [5.2]; 77 [20.6%] aged 18-34 years, 74 [19.8%] aged 35-43 years, 82 [22.0%] aged 44-52 years, and 140 [37.5%] aged 53-75 years). At 12 months, retention rates were 88.8% (166 of 187) for the commercial weight management program group and 95.7% (178 of 186) for the DIY group. At 3 months, participants in the commercial program had a mean (SD) weight loss of −3.8 (4.1) kg vs −1.8 (3.7) kg among those in the DIY group. At 12 months, participants in the commercial program had a mean (SD) weight loss of −4.4 (7.3) kg vs −1.7 (7.3) kg among those in the DIY group. The mean difference between groups was −2.0 kg (97.5% CI, −2.9 to −1.1 kg) at 3 months (P < .001) and −2.6 kg (97.5% CI, −4.3 to −0.8 kg) at 12 months (P < .001). A greater percentage of participants in the commercial program group than participants in the DIY group achieved loss of 5% of body weight at both 3 months (40.7% [72 of 177] vs 18.6% [34 of 183]) and 12 months (42.8% [71 of 166] vs 24.7% [44 of 178]).Conclusions and RelevanceAdults randomly assigned to a commercial weight management program with reduced requirements for dietary self-monitoring lost more weight and were more likely to achieve weight loss of 5% at 3 and 12 months than adults following a DIY approach. This study contributes data on the efficacy of commercial weight management programs and DIY weight management approaches.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03571893

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3