Prevalence of Independence at Home–Qualifying Beneficiaries in Traditional Medicare, 2014-2021

Author:

Lally Tom1,Johnson Emily1,Deligiannidis Konstantinos E.2,Taler George3,Boling Peter4,Yao Aaron56,Kubisiak Joanna7,Lee Angelina7,Kinosian Bruce89

Affiliation:

1. Bloom Health, Denver, Colorado

2. Department of Family Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York

3. Geriatrics and Senior Services, Medstar Health, Baltimore, Maryland

4. Division of Geriatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond

5. Section of Geriatrics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville

6. Home Centered Care Institute, Schaumberg, Illinois

7. Westat, Rockville, Maryland

8. Division of Geriatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

9. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Abstract

ImportanceThe Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Innovation Center Independence at Home (IAH) demonstration, a test of home-based primary care operating in a value-based shared-savings payment model, ended December 2023 after a decade of consistently showing savings to Medicare. It is important to assess whether high-need, IAH-qualified beneficiaries continue to pose a growing challenge to traditional Medicare (TM) or if Medicare Advantage (MA), with programmatic features favorable to caring for this subset of the general Medicare population, can disproportionately provide such care.ObjectiveTo examine the size and share of IAH-qualified beneficiaries in TM and MA.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study used all Medicare claims data and MA encounter data for 2014 and 2021. IAH qualifying criteria were applied to the TM populations enrolled in Parts A and B in 2014 and 2021, and to MA enrollees in 2021. Growth in the number of IAH-qualified TM beneficiaries from 2014 to 2021 was calculated, and the proportions and numbers of IAH-qualified enrollees in the total 2021 TM and MA populations were compared. Data were analyzed between April and June 2023.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe number and share of beneficiaries meeting IAH criteria in TM and MA; the share of TM spending among IAH-qualified beneficiaries.ResultsAmong 64 million Medicare beneficiaries in 2021, there were 30.55 million beneficiaries in TM with Parts A and B coverage, down from 33.82 million in 2014. The number of IAH-qualified beneficiaries in TM grew 51%, from 2.16 million to 3.27 million, while their proportionate share in TM grew 67% from 6.4% to 10.7% of TM between 2014 and 2021. IAH-qualified beneficiaries represented $155 billion in 2021 Medicare Parts A and B spending, 44% of all TM spending, up from 29% of total spending in 2014. In 2021, 2.15 million IAH-qualified beneficiaries represented 8.0% of Medicare Advantage enrollees. Combining TM and MA, 5.42 million IAH-qualified beneficiaries represented 9.3% of all Medicare beneficiaries, with 3.27 million (60.3%) being insured by TM.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study of IAH-qualified Medicare beneficiaries, the share of IAH-qualified beneficiaries in TM grew between 2014 and 2021, with 60% of Medicare high-need beneficiaries accounting for 44% of TM spending. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services should continue to operate value-based programs like IAH that are specifically designed for these high-needs individuals.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Reference20 articles.

1. Independence at home: After 10?years of evidence, it’s time for a permanent Medicare program.;Deligiannidis;J Am Geriatr Soc,2023

2. The Willie Sutton effect in health care: independence at home qualifying (IAH-Q) criteria identify high need, high cost Medicare beneficiaries.;Kinosian;J Am Geriatrics,2016

3. High needs criteria in high need accountable care organization realizing equity, access, and community health inequitably limits access to equally high-need Medicare beneficiaries.;Taler;J Am Geriatr Soc,2023

4. A crosswalk of commonly used frailty scales.;Sison;J Am Geriatr Soc,2023

5. Comparison of claims based frailty indices in US veterans 65 and older for prediction of long-term institutionalization and mortality.;Orkaby;J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3