Affiliation:
1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
2. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Missouri
3. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
Abstract
ImportanceMultiple gestation is one of the biggest risks after in vitro fertilization (IVF), largely due to multiple embryo transfer (MET). Single embryo transfer (SET) uptake has increased over time and has been attributed to various factors, such as mandated insurance coverage for IVF and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).ObjectiveTo investigate whether mandates for IVF insurance coverage are associated with decreased use of MET after PGT-A.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study was conducted using data on embryo transfers reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology between 2014 and 2016. Data were analyzed from January to October 2021.ExposuresState-mandated coverage for fertility treatment and type of cycle transfer performed (PGT-A, untested fresh, and untested frozen).Main Outcomes and MeasuresUse of MET compared with SET, live birth, and live birth of multiples.ResultsThere were 110 843 embryo transfers (mean [SD] patient age, 34.0 [4.5] years; 5520 individuals identified as African American [5.0%], 10 035 as Asian [9.0%], 5425 as Hispanic [4.9%], 45 561 as White [41.1%], and 44 302 as other or unknown race or ethnicity [40.0%]); 17 650 transfers used embryos that underwent PGT-A. Overall, among transferred embryos that had PGT-A, there were 9712 live births (55.0%). The odds of live birth were 70% higher with MET vs SET after frozen embryo transfer with PGT-A (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.61-1.78), but the risk of multiples was 5 times higher (OR, 5.33; 95% CI, 5.22-5.44). The odds of MET in cycles with PGT-A in states with insurance mandates were 24% lower than in states without mandates (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.85).Conclusions and RelevanceThis study found that despite the promise of using SET with PGT-A, MET after PGT-A was not uncommon. This practice was more common in states without insurance mandates and was associated with a high risk of multiples.
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)