Clinical Utility of Universal Germline Genetic Testing for Patients With Breast Cancer

Author:

Whitworth Pat W.12,Beitsch Peter D.23,Patel Rakesh23,Rosen Barry2,Compagnoni Gia4,Baron Paul L.5,Simmons Rache6,Brown Eric A.7,Gold Linsey7,Holmes Dennis8,Smith Linda Ann9,Kinney Michael10,Grady Ian11,Clark Patricia12,Barbosa Karen13,Lyons Samuel14,Riley Lee15,Coomer Cynara16,Curcio Lisa17,Ruiz Antonio18,Khan Sadia19,MacDonald Heather19,Hughes Kevin20,Hardwick Mary Kay2,Heald Brandie3,Munro Sandra B.3,Nielsen Sarah M.3,Esplin Edward D.3

Affiliation:

1. Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, Tennesee

2. TME Breast Care Network, Dallas, Texas

3. Invitae, San Francisco, California

4. Advanced Surgical Care of Northern Illinois, Barrington

5. Northwell Health, New York, New York

6. Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York

7. Comprehensive Breast Care, A Division of Michigan Healthcare Professionals, Troy

8. Private practice, Los Angeles, California

9. Breast Surgery Associates of New Mexico, Albuquerque

10. Center for Advanced Breast Care, Arlington Heights, Illinois

11. North Valley Breast Clinic, Redding, California

12. Ironwood Cancer and Research Centers, Scottsdale, Arizona

13. Alaska Breast Care Specialists, Anchorage

14. Lyons Care Associates, Kahului, Hawaii

15. St Luke’s University Health Network, Easton, Pennsylvania

16. Department of Surgery, Northwell Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, New York

17. Breast Link, Laguna Hills, California

18. Chesapeake Regional Medical Center, Chesapeake, Virginia

19. Hoag Hospital Newport Beach, Newport Beach, California

20. Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston

Abstract

ImportanceNational Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines currently recommend germline testing for high-risk genes in selected patients with breast cancer. The clinical utility of recommending testing all patients with breast cancer with multigene panels is currently under consideration.ObjectiveTo examine the implications of universal testing of patients with breast cancer with respect to clinical decision-making.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsPatients from a previously reported cohort were assessed as in-criteria or out-of-criteria according to the 2017 guidelines and underwent testing with a multigene germline panel between 2017 to 2018. Patients were women and men aged 18 to 90 years, with a new and/or previous diagnosis of breast cancer who had not undergone either single or multigene testing. Clinicians from 20 community and academic sites documented patient clinical information and changes to clinical recommendations made according to test findings. Association between prevalence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants and previously unreported clinical features, including scores generated by the BRCAPRO statistical model, was determined. Data were analyzed from April 2020 to May 2022.ExposureNew and/or previous diagnosis of breast cancer.Main Outcomes and MeasuresDisease management recommendations that were changed as a result of genetic testing results are reported.ResultsClinicians were asked to assess changes to clinical management as a result of germline genetic testing for 952 patients. Informative clinician-reported recommendations were provided for 939 (467 in-criteria and 472 out-of-criteria) of the patients with breast cancer (936 [99.7%] female; 702 [74.8%] White; mean [SD] age at initial diagnosis, 57.6 [11.5] years). One or more changes were reported for 31 of 37 (83.8%) in-criteria patients and 23 of 34 (67.6%) out-of-criteria patients with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant. Recommendations were changed as a result of testing results for 14 of 22 (63.6%) out-of-criteria patients who had a variant in a breast cancer predisposition gene. Clinicians considered testing beneficial for two-thirds of patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants and for one-third of patients with either negative results or variants of uncertain significance. There was no difference in variant rate between patients meeting the BRCAPRO threshold (≥10%) and those who did not (P = .86, Fisher exact test). No changes to clinical recommendations were made for most patients with negative results (345 of 349 patients [98.9%]) or variants of uncertain significance (492 of 509 patients [96.7%]).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, germline genetic testing was used by clinicians to direct treatment for most out-of-criteria patients with breast cancer with pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants, including those with moderate-risk variants. Universal germline testing informs clinical decision-making and provides access to targeted treatments and clinical trials for all patients with breast cancer.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3