Effect of Medication Optimization vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Among US Veterans With Chronic Low Back Pain Receiving Long-term Opioid Therapy

Author:

Bushey Michael A.1,Slaven James E.2,Outcalt Samantha D.3,Kroenke Kurt45,Kempf Carol3,Froman Amanda3,Sargent Christy3,Baecher Brad3,Zillich Alan J.6,Damush Teresa M.345,Saha Chandan2,French Dustin D.78910,Bair Matthew J.345

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis

2. Department of Biostatistics and Heath Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis

3. Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research & Development Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana

4. Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis

5. Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana

6. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, West Lafayette, Indiana

7. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

8. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

9. Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Chicago, Illinois

10. Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois

Abstract

ImportanceMedication management and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) are commonly used treatments for chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, little evidence is available comparing the effectiveness of these approaches.ObjectiveTo compare collaborative care medication optimization vs CBT on pain intensity, interference, and other pain-related outcomes.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe Care Management for the Effective Use of Opioids (CAMEO) trial was a 12-month, comparative effectiveness randomized clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment. Recruitment of veterans with CLBP prescribed long-term opioids occurred at 7 Veterans Affairs primary care clinics from September 1, 2011, to December 31, 2014, and follow-up was completed December 31, 2015. Analyses were based on intention to treat in all randomized participants and were performed from March 22, 2015, to November 1, 2021.InterventionsPatients were randomized to receive either collaborative care with nurse care manager–delivered medication optimization (MED group) (n = 131) or psychologist-delivered CBT (CBT group) (n = 130) for 6 months, with check-in visits at 9 months and final outcome assessment at 12 months.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) total score, a composite of the pain intensity and interference subscales at 6 (treatment completion) and 12 (follow-up completion) months. Scores on the BPI range from 0 to 10, with higher scores representing greater pain impact and a 30% improvement considered a clinically meaningful treatment response. Secondary outcomes included pain-related disability, pain catastrophizing, self-reported substance misuse, health-related quality of life, depression, and anxiety.ResultsA total of 261 patients (241 [92.3%] men; mean [SD] age, 57.9 [9.5] years) were randomized and included in the analysis. Baseline mean (SD) BPI scores in the MED and CBT groups were 6.45 (1.79) and 6.49 (1.67), respectively. Improvements in BPI scores were significantly greater in the MED group at 12 months (between-group difference, −0.54 [95% CI, −1.18 to −0.31]; P = .04) but not at 6 months (between-group difference, −0.46 [95% CI, −0.94 to 0.11]; P = .07). Secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between treatment groups.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized clinical trial among US veterans with CLBP who were prescribed long-term opioid therapy, collaborative care medication optimization was modestly more effective than CBT in reducing pain impact during the 12-month study. However, this difference may not be clinically meaningful or generalize to nonveteran populations.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01236521

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference43 articles.

1. Physician office visits for low back pain: frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a US national survey.;Hart;Spine (Phila Pa 1976),1995

2. What are the most common conditions in primary care? systematic review.;Finley;Can Fam Physician,2018

3. Opioids for low back pain.;Deyo;BMJ,2015

4. Epidemiology of regular prescribed opioid use: results from a national, population-based survey.;Hudson;J Pain Symptom Manage,2008

5. Vital signs: changes in opioid prescribing in the United States, 2006-2015.;Guy;MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3