Naloxone Use in Novel Potent Opioid and Fentanyl Overdoses in Emergency Department Patients

Author:

Amaducci Alexandra1,Aldy Kim23,Campleman Sharan L.2,Li Shao2,Meyn Alison2,Abston Stephanie2,Culbreth Rachel E.2,Krotulski Alex4,Logan Barry45,Wax Paul26,Brent Jeffrey7,Manini Alex F.89,Buchanan Jennie10,Calello Diane10,Carpenter Joseph10,Carey Jennifer10,Hendrickson Robert10,Judge Bryan10,Levine Michael10,Meaden Chris10,Schwarz Evan10,Shulman Joshua10,

Affiliation:

1. Lehigh Valley Health Network-USF Morsani College of Medicine, Allentown, Pennsylvania

2. American College of Medical Toxicology, Phoenix, Arizona

3. Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas

4. Center for Forensic Science Research and Education at the Fredric Rieders Family Foundation, Willow Grove, Pennsylvania

5. NMS Labs, Horsham, Pennsylvania

6. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas

7. University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora

8. NYC Health and Hospitals, Elmhurst, New York

9. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York

10. for the Toxicology Investigators Consortium Fentalog Study Group

Abstract

ImportanceSynthetic opioids, such as the fentanyl analogue and nitazene drug class, are among the fastest growing types of opioids being detected in patients in the emergency department (ED) with illicit opioid overdose (OD). However, clinical outcomes from OD of novel potent opioids (NPOs), specifically nitazenes, are unknown aside from small case series.ObjectiveTo determine naloxone administration and clinical sequelae of patients who were in the ED with NPO overdose compared with fentanyl OD.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis is a cohort study subgroup analysis of adults admitted to the ED and tested positive for NPOs among in the ongoing nationwide ToxIC Fentalog cohort study from 2020 to 2022. Patients who were in the ED with a presumed acute opioid OD and residual blood samples were included, and those testing positive for NPOs were analyzed. Patients were included in this analysis if their confirmatory testing was positive for an NPO analyte, such as brorphine, isotonitazene, metonitazene, and/or N-piperidinyl etonitazene. A comparison group included patients that were positive for fentanyl and devoid of any other analytes on toxicologic analysis.ExposuresPatients were exposed to NPOs, including brorphine, isotonitazene, metonitazene and/or N-piperidinyl etonitazene.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was the total number of naloxone doses and total cumulative naloxone dose administered as part of routine clinical care following the OD. Naloxone requirements and clinical sequelae of NPO-positive patients were compared with those testing positive for fentanyl only.ResultsDuring the study period, 2298 patients were screened, of whom 717 met inclusion criteria, 537 had complete laboratory testing data, with 11 (2.0%) positive for only fentanyl and 9 (1.7%) positive for NPOs (brorphine, isotonitazene, metonitazene, or N-piperidinyl etonitazene). The age range of patients was aged 20 to 57 years (4 males [44.4%] and 5 females [55.6%]). The NPO group received a statistically significantly higher mean (SD) number of naloxone boluses in-hospital (1.33 [1.50]) compared with the fentanyl group (0.36 [0.92]) (P = .02), which corresponded to a moderately large effect size (Cohen d = 0.78). Metonitazene overdose was associated with cardiac arrest and more naloxone doses overall. Metonitazene cases had a mean (SD) number of 3.0 (0) naloxone doses, and 2 of 2 patients (100%) with metonitazene overdoses were administered cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study of patients admitted to the ED with confirmed opioid overdose testing positive for NPOs, in-hospital naloxone dosing was high compared with patients who tested positive for fentanyl alone. Further study is warranted to confirm these preliminary associations.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3