Availability of Family Caregiver Programs in US Cancer Centers

Author:

Odom J. Nicholas123,Applebaum Allison4,Bakitas Marie A.123,Bryant Tara5,Currie Erin1,Curry Kayleigh1,Donovan Heidi678,Fernandez Maria E.9,Ferrell Betty10,Azuero Andres1,Gray Tamryn F.11,Hendricks Bailey A.12,Meier Diane13,Nightingale Chandylen14,Reinhard Susan15,Sannes Timothy S.16,Sterba Katherine17,Young Heather M.18

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham

2. Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham

3. Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham

4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

5. Viva Health Inc, Birmingham, Alabama

6. School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

7. School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

8. National Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Family Support, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

9. Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston

10. City of Hope, Duarte, California

11. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

12. College of Nursing, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha

13. Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York

14. Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

15. AARP Public Policy Institute, Washington, DC

16. UMass Memorial Cancer Center, Worcester, Massachusetts

17. Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston

18. Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California, Davis

Abstract

ImportanceFamily caregivers provide the majority of health care to the 18 million patients with cancer in the US. Yet despite providing complex medical and nursing care, a large proportion of caregivers report no formal support or training. In recognition of this gap, many interventions to support cancer caregivers have been developed and tested over the past 2 decades. However, there are few system-level data on whether US cancer centers have adopted and implemented these interventions.ObjectiveTo describe and characterize the availability of family caregiver support programs in US cancer centers.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional national survey study was conducted between September 1, 2021, and April 30, 2023. Participants comprised clinical and administrative staff of Commission on Cancer–accredited US cancer centers. Data analysis was performed in May and June 2023.Main Outcomes and MeasuresSurvey questions about the availability of 11 types of family caregiver programs (eg, peer mentoring, education classes, and psychosocial programs) were developed after literature review, assessment of similar program evaluation surveys, and discussions among a 13-member national expert advisory committee. Family caregiver programs were defined as structured, planned, and coordinated groups of activities and procedures aimed at specifically supporting family caregivers as part of usual care. Survey responses were tabulated using standard descriptive statistics, including means, proportions, and frequencies.ResultsOf the surveys sent to potential respondents at 971 adult cancer centers, 238 were completed (response rate, 24.5%). After nonresponse weight adjustment, most cancer centers (75.4%) had at least 1 family caregiver program; 24.6% had none. The most common program type was information and referral services (53.6%). Cancer centers with no programs were more likely to have smaller annual outpatient volumes (χ2 = 11.10; P = .011). Few centers had caregiver programs on training in medical and/or nursing tasks (21.7%), caregiver self-care (20.2%), caregiver-specific distress screening (19.3%), peer mentoring (18.9%), and children caregiving for parents (8.3%). Very few programs were developed from published evidence in a journal (8.1%). The top reason why cancer centers selected their programs was community members requesting the program (26.3%); only 12.3% of centers selected their programs based on scientific evidence. Most programs were funded by the cancer center or hospital (58.6%) or by philanthropy (42.4%).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this survey study, most cancer centers had family caregiver programs; however, a quarter had none. Furthermore, the scope of programming was limited and rarely evidence based, with few centers offering caregiving education and training. These findings suggest that implementation strategies are critically needed to foster uptake of evidence-based caregiver interventions.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3