Safety and Tolerability of SER-109 as an Investigational Microbiome Therapeutic in Adults With Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection
-
Published:2023-02-13
Issue:2
Volume:6
Page:e2255758
-
ISSN:2574-3805
-
Container-title:JAMA Network Open
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JAMA Netw Open
Author:
Sims Matthew D.123, Khanna Sahil4, Feuerstadt Paul56, Louie Thomas J.7, Kelly Colleen R.8, Huang Edward S.9, Hohmann Elizabeth L.10, Wang Elaine E. L.11, Oneto Caterina12, Cohen Stuart H.13, Berenson Charles S.14, Korman Louis15, Lee Christine16, Lashner Bret17, Kraft Colleen S.18, Ramesh Mayur19, Silverman Michael20, Pardi Darrell S.4, De Ananya11, Memisoglu Asli11, Lombardi David A.11, Hasson Brooke R.11, McGovern Barbara H.11, von Moltke Lisa11, Hemaidan Anmar21, Kumar Princy21, Misra Bharat21, Nathan Richard21, Nguyen Hien21, Pullman John21, Williams Jeffrey21, Acosta Idalia21, Odio Alberto21, Tran Huy21, Smith Kent21, Weinstock Leonard21, Hansen Val21, Georgetson Michael21, Sheikh Aasim21, Garcia-Diaz Julia21, Arimie Calin21, Andrade Gladys21, O'Marro Steven21, Esfandyari Tuba21, Ritter Timothy21, Mcnicol Baird Ian21, Colman Ronald21, Patel Meenakshi21, Hernandez Lilliam21, Adams Atoya21, Walton Marie21, Arsenescu Razvan21, Shapiro Max21, Cook Paul21, Heuer Marvin21, Bogdanovich Tatiana21, Grimard Doria21, Steiner Theodore21, Butt Debra21, Daley Peter21, Gauthier Stephanie21, Guimont Chantal21, Kreines Michael21, Berman Larry21, Bennett Michael21, Fogel Ronald21, Moises Gutierrez Juan Carlos21, Pedersen Peder21, Bressler Adam21, Nadar Venkatesh21, Newton Eric21, Diaz Jorge21, Abbas Jalal21, DuPont Herbert21, Jamal Aamir21, Talreja Neetu21, Benjamin Sabrina21, Ayub Kamran21, Oguchi Godson21, Pinero Jose21, Ramesh Gowrappala21, Sepe Paul21, Brook Loren21, Ruthardt Frederick21, Surace Lindsey21, Hussain Ayub21, Rutland Travis21, Schmalz Micahel21, Degala Gourisankar21, Phillips Raymond21, Stock Kent21, Bullock Jeffrey21, Onwueme Kenolisa21,
Affiliation:
1. Section of Infectious Diseases and International Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan 3. Department of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan 4. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 5. Division of Digestive Disease, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 6. Physicians Alliance of Connecticut–Gastroenterology Center, Hamden, Connecticut 7. Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 8. Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 9. Department of Gastroenterology, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Health, Mountain View, California 10. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 11. Seres Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts 12. Vanguard Gastroenterology, New York, New York 13. University of California Davis Health, Sacramento 14. University at Buffalo, VA Western New York Healthcare System, Buffalo 15. Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chevy Chase Clinical Research, Chevy Chase, Maryland 16. Island Medical Program, University of British Columbia and University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada 17. Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 18. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 19. Division of Infectious Diseases, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan 20. Western University, London, Ontario, Canada 21. for the ECOSPOR IV Investigators
Abstract
ImportanceA safe and effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is urgently needed. Antibiotics kill toxin-producing bacteria but do not repair the disrupted microbiome, which promotes spore germination and infection recurrence.ObjectivesTo evaluate the safety and rate of CDI recurrence after administration of investigational microbiome therapeutic SER-109 through 24 weeks.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis phase 3, single-arm, open-label trial (ECOSPOR IV) was conducted at 72 US and Canadian outpatient sites from October 2017 to April 2022. Adults aged 18 years or older with recurrent CDI were enrolled in 2 cohorts: (1) rollover patients from the ECOSPOR III trial who had CDI recurrence diagnosed by toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and (2) patients with at least 1 CDI recurrence (diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction [PCR] or toxin EIA), inclusive of their acute infection at study entry.InterventionsSER-109 given orally as 4 capsules daily for 3 days following symptom resolution after antibiotic treatment for CDI.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcomes were safety, measured as the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in all patients receiving any amount of SER-109, and cumulative rates of recurrent CDI (toxin-positive diarrhea requiring treatment) through week 24 in the intent-to-treat population.ResultsOf 351 patients screened, 263 were enrolled (180 [68.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 64.0 [15.7] years); 29 were in cohort 1 and 234 in cohort 2. Seventy-seven patients (29.3%) were enrolled with their first CDI recurrence. Overall, 141 patients (53.6%) had TEAEs, which were mostly mild to moderate and gastrointestinal. There were 8 deaths (3.0%) and 33 patients (12.5%) with serious TEAEs; none were considered treatment related by the investigators. Overall, 23 patients (8.7%; 95% CI, 5.6%-12.8%) had recurrent CDI at week 8 (4 of 29 [13.8%; 95% CI, 3.9%-31.7%] in cohort 1 and 19 of 234 [8.1%; 95% CI, 5.0%-12.4%] in cohort 2), and recurrent CDI rates remained low through 24 weeks (36 patients [13.7%; 95% CI, 9.8%-18.4%]). At week 8, recurrent CDI rates in patients with a first recurrence were similarly low (5 of 77 [6.5%; 95% CI, 2.1%-14.5%]) as in patients with 2 or more recurrences (18 of 186 [9.7%; 95% CI, 5.8%-14.9%]). Analyses by select baseline characteristics showed consistently low recurrent CDI rates in patients younger than 65 years vs 65 years or older (5 of 126 [4.0%; 95% CI, 1.3%-9.0%] vs 18 of 137 [13.1%; 95% CI, 8.0%-20.0%]) and patients enrolled based on positive PCR results (3 of 69 [4.3%; 95% CI, 0.9%-12.2%]) vs those with positive toxin EIA results (20 of 192 [10.4%; 95% CI, 6.5%-15.6%]).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this trial, oral SER-109 was well tolerated in a patient population with recurrent CDI and prevalent comorbidities. The rate of recurrent CDI was low regardless of the number of prior recurrences, demographics, or diagnostic approach, supporting the beneficial impact of SER-109 for patients with CDI.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03183141
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|