Comparison of Sales From Vending Machines With 4 Different Food and Beverage Messages

Author:

Gibson Laura A.12,Stephens-Shields Alisa J.3,Hua Sophia V.12,Orr Jennifer A.12,Lawman Hannah G.45,Bleich Sara N.6,Volpp Kevin G.127,Bleakley Amy8,Thorndike Anne N.910,Roberto Christina A.12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia

2. Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics at the University of Pennsylvania’s Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia

3. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia

4. Division of Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

5. Now with Novo Nordisk Inc, Plainsboro Township, New Jersey

6. Department of Health Policy & Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

7. Department of Health Care Management, University of Pennsylvania Wharton School, Philadelphia

8. Department of Communication, University of Delaware, Newark

9. Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

10. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

ImportancePoint-of-sale food messaging can encourage healthier purchases, but no studies have directly compared multiple interventions in the field.ObjectiveTo examine which of 4 food and beverage messages would increase healthier vending machine purchases.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis randomized trial assessed 13 months (February 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020) of vending sales data from 267 machines and 1065 customer purchase assessments from vending machines on government property in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Data analysis was performed from March 5, 2020, to November 8, 2022.InterventionsStudy interventions were 4 food and beverage messaging systems: (1) beverage tax posters encouraging healthy choices because of the Philadelphia tax on sweetened drinks; (2) green labels for healthy products; (3) traffic light labels: green (healthy), yellow (moderately healthy), or red (unhealthy); or (4) physical activity equivalent labels (minutes of activity to metabolize product calories).Main Outcomes and MeasuresSales data were analyzed separately for beverages and snacks. The main outcomes analyzed at the transaction level were calories sold and the health status (using traffic light criteria) of each item sold. Additional outcomes were analyzed at the monthly machine level: total units sold, calories sold, and units of each health status sold. The customer purchase assessment outcome was calories purchased per vending trip.ResultsMonthly sales data came from 150 beverage and 117 snack vending machines, whereas 1065 customers (558 [52%] male) contributed purchase assessment data. Traffic light labels led to a 30% decrease in the mean monthly number of unhealthy beverages sold (mean ratio [MR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.88) compared with beverage tax posters. Physical activity labels led to a 34% (MR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.87) reduction in the number of unhealthy beverages sold at the machine level and 35% (MR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50-0.86) reduction in mean calories sold. Traffic light labels also led to a 30-calorie reduction (b = −30.46; 95% CI, −49.36 to −11.56) per customer trip in the customer purchase analyses compared to physical activity labels. There were very few significant differences for snack machines.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this 13-month randomized trial of 267 vending machines, the traffic light and physical activity labels encouraged healthier beverage purchases, but no change in snack sales, compared with a beverage tax poster. Corporations and governments should consider such labeling approaches to promote healthier beverage choices.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06260176

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Reference39 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3