Online Well-Being Group Coaching Program for Women Physician Trainees

Author:

Mann Adrienne12,Shah Ami N.3,Thibodeau Pari Shah4,Dyrbye Liselotte5,Syed Adnan67,Woodward Maria A.8,Thurmon Kerri9,Jones Christine D.1210,Dunbar Kimiko S.11,Fainstad Tyra5

Affiliation:

1. Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora

2. Veterans’ Health Administration, Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora

3. Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

4. Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora

5. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora

6. University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora

7. Veterans’ Health Administration, Eastern CO Health Care System, Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value Driven Care, Aurora, Colorado

8. Perspectives Coaching Analytics LLC, Birmingham, Michigan

9. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora

10. Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora

11. Children’s Hospital of Colorado, Section of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora

Abstract

ImportancePhysician burnout disproportionately affects women physicians and begins in training. Professional coaching may improve well-being, but generalizable evidence is lacking.ObjectiveTo assess the generalizability of a coaching program (Better Together Physician Coaching) in a national sample of women physician trainees.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA randomized clinical trial involving trainees in 26 graduate medical education institutions in 19 states was conducted between September 1, 2022, and December 31, 2022. Eligible participants included physician trainees at included sites who self-identified as a woman (ie, self-reported their gender identity as woman, including those who reported woman if multiple genders were reported).InterventionA 4-month, web-based, group coaching program.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were change in burnout (measured using subscales for emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal achievement from the Maslach Burnout Inventory). Secondary outcomes included changes in impostor syndrome, moral injury, self-compassion, and flourishing, which were assessed using standardized measures. A linear mixed model analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis. A sensitivity analysis was performed to account for the missing outcomes.ResultsAmong the 1017 women trainees in the study (mean [SD] age, 30.8 [4.0] years; 540 White participants [53.1%]; 186 surgical trainees [18.6%]), 502 were randomized to the intervention group and 515 were randomized to the control group. Emotional exhaustion decreased by an estimated mean (SE) −3.81 (0.73) points in the intervention group compared with a mean (SE) increase of 0.32 (0.57) points in the control group (absolute difference [SE], −4.13 [0.92] points; 95% CI, −5.94 to −2.32 points; P < .001). Depersonalization decreased by a mean (SE) of −1.66 (0.42) points in the intervention group compared with a mean (SE) increase of 0.20 (0.32) points in the control group (absolute difference [SE], −1.87 [0.53] points; 95%CI, −2.91 to −0.82 points; P < .001). Impostor syndrome decreased by a mean (SE) of −1.43 (0.14) points in the intervention group compared with −0.15 (0.11) points in the control group (absolute difference [SE], −1.28 (0.18) points; 95% CI −1.63 to −0.93 points; P < .001). Moral injury decreased by a mean (SE) of −5.60 (0.92) points in the intervention group compared with −0.92 (0.71) points in the control group (absolute difference [SE], −4.68 [1.16] points; 95% CI, −6.95 to −2.41 points; P < .001). Self-compassion increased by a mean (SE) of 5.27 (0.47) points in the intervention group and by 1.36 (0.36) points in the control group (absolute difference [SE], 3.91 [0.60] points; 95% CI, 2.73 to 5.08 points; P < .001). Flourishing improved by a mean (SE) of 0.48 (0.09) points in the intervention group vs 0.09 (0.07) points in the control group (absolute difference [SE], 0.38 [0.11] points; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.60 points; P < .001). The sensitivity analysis found similar findings.Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings of this randomized clinical trial suggest that web-based professional group-coaching can improve outcomes of well-being and mitigate symptoms of burnout for women physician trainees.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05222685

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3