Liver Metastases and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy in Patients With Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Author:

Chen Eric X.1,Loree Jonathan M.2,Titmuss Emma2,Jonker Derek J.3,Kennecke Hagen F.4,Berry Scott5,Couture Felix6,Ahmad Chaudharry E.7,Goffin John R.8,Kavan Petr9,Harb Mohammed10,Colwell Bruce11,Samimi Setareh12,Samson Benoit13,Abbas Tahir14,Aucoin Nathalie15,Aubin Francine16,Koski Sheryl17,Wei Alice C.18,Tu Dongsheng19,O’Callaghan Chris J.19

Affiliation:

1. Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

2. British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada

3. The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

4. Portland Providence Cancer Center, Earle Chiles Research Institute, Portland, Oregon

5. Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

6. L’Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Laval, Quebec, Canada

7. Eastern Health, St John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

8. Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

9. Segal Cancer Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

10. Moncton Hospital, Moncton, Brunswick, Canada

11. Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

12. Hôpital Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

13. Charles LeMoyne Hospital Cancer Centre, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

14. Saskatoon Cancer Center, Saskatoon, Saskatoon, Canada

15. Hôpital de la Cité-de-la-Santé, Laval, Quebec, Canada

16. Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

17. Cross Cancer Center, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

18. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York

19. Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

ImportanceImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have limited activity in microsatellite-stable (MSS) or mismatch repair–proficient (pMMR) colorectal cancer. Recent findings suggest the efficacy of ICIs may be modulated by the presence of liver metastases (LM).ObjectiveTo investigate the association between the presence of LM and ICI activity in advanced MSS colorectal cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this secondary analysis of the Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO26 (CCTG CO.26) randomized clinical trial, patients with treatment-refractory colorectal cancer were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to durvalumab plus tremelimumab or best supportive care alone between August 10, 2016, and June 15, 2017. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) with 80% power and 2-sided α = .10. The median follow-up was 15.2 (0.2-22.0) months. In this post hoc analysis performed from February 11 to 14, 2022, subgroups were defined based on the presence or absence of LM and study treatments.InterventionDurvalumab plus tremelimumab or best supportive care.Main Outcomes and MeasuresHazard ratios (HRs) and 90% CIs were calculated based on a stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model. Plasma tumor mutation burden at study entry was determined using a circulating tumor DNA assay. The primary end point of the study was OS, defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause; secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR).ResultsOf 180 patients enrolled (median age, 65 [IQR, 36-87] years; 121 [67.2%] men; 19 [10.6%] Asian, 151 [83.9%] White, and 10 [5.6%] other race or ethnicity), LM were present in 127 (70.6%). For patients with LM, there was a higher proportion of male patients (94 of 127 [74.0%] vs 27 of 53 [50.9%]; P = .005), and the time from initial cancer diagnosis to study entry was shorter (median, 40 [range, 8-153] vs 56 [range, 14-181] months; P = .001). Plasma tumor mutation burden was significantly higher in patients with LM. Patients without LM had significantly improved PFS with durvalumab plus tremelimumab (HR, 0.54 [90% CI, 0.35-0.96]; P = .08; P = .02 for interaction). Disease control rate was 49% (90% CI, 36%-62%) in patients without LM treated with durvalumab plus tremelimumab, compared with 14% (90% CI, 6%-38%) in those with LM (odds ratio, 5.70 [90% CI, 1.46-22.25]; P = .03). On multivariable analysis, patients without LM had significantly improved OS and PFS compared with patients with LM.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this secondary analysis of the CCTG CO.26 study, the presence of LM was associated with worse outcomes for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Patients without LM had improved PFS and higher DCR with durvalumab plus tremelimumab. Liver metastases may be associated with poor outcomes of ICI treatment in advanced colorectal cancer and should be considered in the design and interpretation of future clinical studies evaluating this therapy.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3