Effectiveness of Structured Care Coordination for Children With Medical Complexity

Author:

Cohen Eyal12345,Quartarone Samantha1,Orkin Julia134,Moretti Myla E.126,Emdin Abby178,Guttmann Astrid12345,Willan Andrew R.7,Major Nathalie9,Lim Audrey10,Diaz Sanober11,Osqui Lisa11,Soscia Joanna1312,Fu Longdi5,Gandhi Sima5,Heath Anna121314,Fayed Nora15

Affiliation:

1. Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

2. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Division of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

4. Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

5. ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

6. Clinical Trials Unit, Ontario Child Health Support Unit, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

7. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

8. Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

9. Department of Paediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

10. Department of Pediatrics, Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

11. Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

12. Lawrence M. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

13. Division of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

14. Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom

15. School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

ImportanceChildren with medical complexity (CMC) have chronic conditions and high health needs and may experience fragmented care.ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of a structured complex care program, Complex Care for Kids Ontario (CCKO), with usual care.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis randomized clinical trial used a waitlist variation for randomizing patients from 12 complex care clinics in Ontario, Canada, over 2 years. The study was conducted from December 2016 to June 2021. Participants were identified based on complex care clinic referral and randomly allocated into an intervention group, seen at the next available clinic appointment, or a control group that was placed on a waitlist to receive the intervention after 12 months.InterventionAssignment of a nurse practitioner–pediatrician dyad partnering with families in a structured complex care clinic to provide intensive care coordination and comprehensive plans of care.Main Outcomes and MeasuresCo-primary outcomes, assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months postrandomization, were service delivery indicators from the Family Experiences With Coordination of Care that scored (1) coordination of care among health care professionals, (2) coordination of care between health care professionals and families, and (3) utility of care planning tools. Secondary outcomes included child and parent health outcomes and child health care system utilization and cost.ResultsOf 144 participants randomized, 141 had complete health administrative data, and 139 had complete baseline surveys. The median (IQR) age of the participants was 29 months (9-102); 83 (60%) were male. At 12 months, scores for utility of care planning tools improved in the intervention group compared with the waitlist group (adjusted odds ratio, 9.3; 95% CI, 3.9-21.9; P < .001), with no difference between groups for the other 2 co-primary outcomes. There were no group differences for secondary outcomes of child outcomes, parent outcomes, and health care system utilization and cost. At 24 months, when both groups were receiving the intervention, no primary outcome differences were observed. Total health care costs in the second year were lower for the intervention group (median, CAD$17 891; IQR, 6098-61 346; vs CAD$37 524; IQR, 9338-119 547 [US $13 415; IQR, 4572-45 998; vs US $28 136; IQR, 7002-89 637]; P = .01).Conclusions and RelevanceThe CCKO program improved the perceived utility of care planning tools but not other outcomes at 1 year. Extended evaluation periods may be helpful in assessing pediatric complex care interventions.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02928757

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3