The Role of Family Support in Moderating Mental Health Outcomes for LGBTQ+ Youth in Primary Care

Author:

DelFerro Joseph1,Whelihan Joseph234,Min Jungwon35,Powell Maura3,DiFiore Gabrielle3,Gzesh Ari4,Jelinek Scott14,Schwartz Karen T. G.6,Davis Molly1367,Jones Jason D.16,Fiks Alexander G.137,Jenssen Brian P.137,Wood Sarah13467

Affiliation:

1. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

2. Pediatric Residency Program, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

3. Clinical Futures and PolicyLab, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

4. Craig Dalsimer Division of Adolescent Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

5. Data Science and Biostatistics Unit, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

6. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

7. Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Abstract

ImportanceLesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and/or questioning (LGBTQ+) youth face worse mental health outcomes than non-LGBTQ+ peers. Family support may mitigate this, but sparse evidence demonstrates this in clinical settings.ObjectivesTo compare depression and suicide risk between LGBTQ+ and non-LGBTQ+ youth in primary care settings and to investigate whether family support mitigates these negative mental health outcomes.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study uses data from well care visits completed by adolescents aged 13 to 19 years from February 2022 through May 2023, including the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 Modified for Teens (PHQ-9-M) and the Adolescent Health Questionnaire (AHQ; an electronic screener assessing identity, behaviors, and guardian support), at 32 urban or suburban care clinics in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.ExposuresThe primary exposure was self-reported LGBTQ+ status. Family support moderators included parental discussion of adolescent strengths and listening to feelings. Race and ethnicity (determined via parent or guardian report at visit check-in), sex, payer, language, age, and geography were covariates.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPHQ-9-M–derived mental health outcomes, including total score, recent suicidal ideation, and past suicide attempt.ResultsThe sample included 60 626 adolescents; among them, 9936 (16.4%) were LGBTQ+, 15 387 (25.5%) were Black, and 30 296 (50.0%) were assigned female sex at birth. LGBTQ+ youth, compared with non-LGBTQ+ youth, had significantly higher median (IQR) PHQ-9-M scores (5 [2-9] vs 1 [0-3]; P < .001) and prevalence of suicidal ideation (1568 [15.8%] vs 1723 [3.4%]; P < .001). Fewer LGBTQ+ youth endorsed parental support than non-LGBTQ+ youth (discussion of strengths, 8535 [85.9%] vs 47 003 [92.7%]; P < .001; and listening to feelings, 7930 [79.8%] vs 47 177 [93.1%]; P < .001). In linear regression adjusted for demographic characteristics and parental discussion of strengths, LGBTQ+ status was associated with a higher PHQ-9-M score (mean difference, 3.3 points; 95% CI, 3.2-3.3 points). In logistic regression, LGBTQ+ youth had increased adjusted odds of suicidal ideation (adjusted odds ratio, 4.3; 95% CI, 4.0-4.7) and prior suicide attempt (adjusted odds ratio, 4.4; 95% CI, 4.0-4.7). Parental support significantly moderated the association of LGBTQ+ status with PHQ-9-M score and suicidal ideation, with greater protection against these outcomes for LGBTQ+ vs non-LGBTQ+ youth.Conclusions and RelevanceCompared with non-LGBTQ+ youth, LGBTQ+ youth at primary care visits had more depressive symptoms and higher odds of suicidal ideation and prior suicide attempt. Youth-reported parental support was protective against these outcomes, suggesting potential benefits of family support–focused interventions to mitigate mental health inequities for LGBTQ+ youth.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Reference44 articles.

1. Suicidality and depression disparities between sexual minority and heterosexual youth: a meta-analytic review.;Marshal;J Adolesc Health,2011

2. Health care disparities among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth: a literature review.;Hafeez;Cureus,2017

3. Bisexual individuals are at greater risk of poor mental health than lesbians and gay men: the mediating role of sexual identity stress at multiple levels.;Chan;J Affect Disord,2020

4. Intersectional minority stress and alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis use among sexual and gender minority adolescents of color: moderating role of family support.;Mereish;LGBT Health,2023

5. Mental health challenges of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people: an integrated literature review.;Moagi;Health SA,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3