Association Between Nephrologist Ownership of Dialysis Facilities and Clinical Outcomes

Author:

Lin Eugene123,McCoy Matthew S.45,Liu Manqing6,Lung Khristina I.2,Rapista Derick27,Berns Jeffrey S.8,Kanter Genevieve P.2459

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles

2. Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles

3. Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles

4. Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

5. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

6. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

7. Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

8. Department of Medicine, Renal Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

9. Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Abstract

ImportanceOwnership of US dialysis facilities presents a financial conflict of interest for nephrologists, who may change their clinical practice to improve facility profitability.ObjectiveTo investigate the association between nephrologist ownership of freestanding dialysis facilities and clinical outcomes.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study was conducted using US Renal Data System data linked to a data set of freestanding nonpediatric dialysis facility owners. Participants were a sample of all adults with fee-for-service Medicare receiving dialysis for end-stage kidney disease from January 2017 to November 2017 at included facilities. Data were analyzed from April 2020 through August 2022.ExposuresOutcomes associated with nephrologist ownership were assessed using a difference-in-differences analysis comparing the difference in outcomes between patients treated by nephrologist owners and patients treated by nonowners within facilities owned by nephrologists after accounting for differences in patient outcomes between nephrologist owners and nonowners in other facilities.Main Outcomes and MeasuresOutcomes plausibly associated with nephrologist ownership were evaluated: (1) treatment volumes (missed treatments and transplant waitlist status); (2) erythropoietin-stimulating agent (ESA) use and related outcomes (anemia, defined as hemoglobin level <10 g/dL, and blood transfusions), (3) quality metrics (mortality, hospitalizations, 30-day readmissions, hemodialysis adequacy, arteriovenous fistula use, and hemodialysis catheter use for ≥3 months), and (4) home dialysis use.ResultsA cohort of 251 651 patients (median [IQR] age, 66 [46-85] years; 112 054 [44.5%] women; 9765 Asian [3.9%], 86 837 Black [34.5%], and 148 617 White [59.1%]; 38 938 Hispanic [15.5%]) receiving dialysis for end-stage kidney disease were included. Patient treatment by nephrologist owners at their owned facilities was associated with a 2.4 percentage point (95% CI, 1.1-3.8 percentage points) higher probability of home dialysis, a 2.2 percentage point (95% CI, 3.6-0.7 percentage points) lower probability of receiving an ESA, and no significant difference in anemia or blood transfusions. Patient treatment by nephrologist owners at their owned facilities was not associated with differences in missed treatments, transplant waitlisting, mortality, hospitalizations, 30-day readmissions, hemodialysis adequacy, or fistula or long-term dialysis catheter use.Conclusions and RelevanceThis cross-sectional cohort study found that nephrologist ownership was associated with increased home dialysis use, decreased ESA use, and no change in anemia or blood transfusions.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Internal Medicine

Reference34 articles.

1. Dialysis-facility joint-venture ownership–hidden conflicts of interest.;Berns;N Engl J Med,2018

2. Request for information; health and safety requirements for transplant programs, organ procurement organizations, and end-stage renal disease facilities.;Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services;Fed Regist,2021

3. Re-evaluation of re-hospitalization and rehabilitation in renal research.;Lin;Hemodial Int,2017

4. Home dialysis in the prospective payment system era.;Lin;J Am Soc Nephrol,2017

5. The “Advancing American Kidney Health” executive order: challenges and opportunities for the large dialysis organizations.;Lin;Am J Kidney Dis,2020

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Differences in Outcomes by Place of Origin among Hispanic Patients with Kidney Failure;Journal of the American Society of Nephrology;2023-09-27

2. Setting Up Home Dialysis Programs;Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology;2023-08-21

3. Physicians as Owners and Agents—A Call for Further Study;JAMA Internal Medicine;2022-12-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3