Evaluation of the Inclusion of Studies Identified by the FDA as Having Falsified Data in the Results of Meta-analyses-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Evaluation of the Inclusion of Studies Identified by the FDA as Having Falsified Data in the Results of Meta-analyses

Published:2019-04-01 Issue:4 Volume:179 Page:582
ISSN:2168-6106
Container-title:JAMA Internal Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:JAMA Intern Med

Author:

Garmendia Craig A.¹,Nassar Gorra Liliana²,Rodriguez Ana Lucia³,Trepka Mary Jo²,Veledar Emir⁴,Madhivanan Purnima²

Affiliation:

1. Office of Bioresearch Monitoring Operations, Office of Regulatory Affairs, US Food and Drug Administration, Miami, Florida

2. Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami

3. Department of Psychology, School of Integrated Science and Humanity, Florida International University, Miami

4. Department of Biostatistics, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Internal Medicine

Link

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/articlepdf/2726046/jamainternal_garmendia_2019_ld_180072_1605820474.83682.pdf

Reference5 articles.

1. Research misconduct in FDA-regulated clinical trials: a cross-sectional analysis of warning letters and disqualification proceedings.;Garmendia;Ther Innov Regul Sci,2018

2. Research misconduct identified by the US Food and Drug Administration: out of sight, out of mind, out of the peer-reviewed literature.;Seife;JAMA Intern Med,2015

3. Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis.;Slavin;J Clin Epidemiol,1995

4. The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 5.1.0). https://training.cochrane.org/handbook. Accessed September 5, 2018.

5. Office of Research Integrity, US Department of Health and Human Services. Definition of Research Misconduct (April 25, 2011). https://ori.hhs.gov/definition-misconduct. Accessed September 5, 2018.

Cited by 30 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The relationship between methodological quality and the use of retracted publications in evidence syntheses;Systematic Reviews;2023-09-20

2. Reducing the residue of retractions in evidence synthesis: ways to minimise inappropriate citation and use of retracted data;BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine;2023-07-18

3. Effectiveness of the “But-you-are-free” technique;Meta-Psychology;2023-07-10

4. Characteristics of retracted publications related to pain research: a systematic review;Pain;2023-06-09

5. Assessing the robustness of results from clinical trials and meta-analyses with the fragility index;American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology;2023-03