Readability of Patient Education Materials in Head and Neck Cancer

Author:

Armache Maria1,Assi Sahar23,Wu Richard4,Jain Amiti5,Lu Joseph5,Gordon Larissa5,Jacobs Lisa M.6,Fundakowski Christopher E.7,Rising Kristin L.89,Leader Amy E.101112,Fakhry Carole1,Mady Leila J.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology−Head & Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

2. Cochlear Center for Hearing and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

3. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

4. Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

5. Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

6. Mixed Methods Research Lab, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

7. Department of Otolaryngology−Head and Neck Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

8. Jefferson Center for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

9. Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

10. Department of Population Health, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

11. Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

12. Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Abstract

ImportancePatient education materials (PEMs) can promote patient engagement, satisfaction, and treatment adherence. The American Medical Association recommends that PEMs be developed for a sixth-grade or lower reading level. Health literacy (HL) refers to an individual’s ability to seek, understand, and use health information to make appropriate decisions regarding their health. Patients with suboptimal HL may not be able to understand or act on health information and are at risk for adverse health outcomes.ObjectiveTo assess the readability of PEMs on head and neck cancer (HNC) and to evaluate HL among patients with HNC.Evidence ReviewA systematic review of the literature was performed by searching Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus for peer-reviewed studies published from 1995 to 2024 using the keywords head and neck cancer, readability, health literacy, and related synonyms. Full-text studies in English that evaluated readability and/or HL measures were included. Readability assessments included the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL grade, 0-20, with higher grades indicating greater reading difficulty) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE score, 1-100, with higher scores indicating easier readability), among others. Reviews, conference materials, opinion letters, and guidelines were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies.FindingsOf the 3235 studies identified, 17 studies assessing the readability of 1124 HNC PEMs produced by professional societies, hospitals, and others were included. The mean FKGL grade ranged from 8.8 to 14.8; none of the studies reported a mean FKGL of grade 6 or lower. Eight studies assessed HL and found inadequate HL prevalence ranging from 11.9% to 47.0%.Conclusions and RelevanceThese findings indicate that more than one-third of patients with HNC demonstrate inadequate HL, yet none of the PEMs assessed were developed for a sixth grade or lower reading level, as recommended by the American Medical Association. This incongruence highlights the need to address the readability of HNC PEMs to improve patient understanding of the disease and to mitigate potential barriers to shared decision-making for patients with HNC. It is crucial to acknowledge the responsibility of health care professionals to produce and promote more effective PEMs to dismantle the potentially preventable literacy barriers.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3