Screening for Skin Cancer

Author:

,Mangione Carol M.1,Barry Michael J.2,Nicholson Wanda K.3,Chelmow David4,Coker Tumaini Rucker5,Davis Esa M.6,Donahue Katrina E.7,Jaén Carlos Roberto8,Kubik Martha9,Li Li10,Ogedegbe Gbenga11,Rao Goutham12,Ruiz John M.13,Stevermer James14,Tsevat Joel8,Underwood Sandra Millon15,Wong John B.16

Affiliation:

1. University of California, Los Angeles

2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

3. George Washington University, Washington, DC

4. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond

5. University of Washington, Seattle

6. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

7. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

8. University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio

9. George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia

10. University of Virginia, Charlottesville

11. New York University, New York, New York

12. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

13. University of Arizona, Tucson

14. University of Missouri, Columbia

15. University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

16. Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

ImportanceSkin cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the US. There are different types of skin cancer varying in disease incidence and severity. Basal and squamous cell carcinomas are the most common types of skin cancer but infrequently lead to death or substantial morbidity. Melanomas represent about 1% of skin cancer and cause the most skin cancer deaths. Melanoma is about 30 times more common in White persons than in Black persons. However, persons with darker skin color are often diagnosed at later stages, when skin cancer is more difficult to treat.ObjectiveTo update its 2016 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review on the benefits and harms of screening for skin cancer in asymptomatic adolescents and adults.PopulationAsymptomatic adolescents and adults who do not have a history of premalignant or malignant skin lesions.Evidence AssessmentThe USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient to determine the balance of benefits and harms of visual skin examination by a clinician to screen for skin cancer in asymptomatic adolescents and adults.RecommendationThe USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of visual skin examination by a clinician to screen for skin cancer in adolescents and adults. (I statement)

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3