Association Between Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract and In-Hospital Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation

Author:

Hammond Naomi E.12,Myburgh John13,Seppelt Ian14,Garside Tessa12,Vlok Ruan2,Mahendran Sajeev2,Adigbli Derick12,Finfer Simon15,Gao Ya67,Goodman Fiona1,Guyatt Gordon8,Santos Joseph Alvin9,Venkatesh Balasubramanian110,Yao Liang7,Di Tanna Gian Luca911,Delaney Anthony12

Affiliation:

1. Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

2. Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

3. Department of Intensive Care, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia

4. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia

5. The George Institute for Global Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom

6. Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China

7. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

8. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

9. Biostatistics and Data Science Division, Meta-Research and Evidence Synthesis, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

10. Intensive Care Unit, Wesley and Princess Alexandra Hospitals, Queensland, Australia

11. Department of Innovative Technologies, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Viganello-Lugano, Switzerland

Abstract

ImportanceThe effectiveness of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) in critically ill adults receiving mechanical ventilation is uncertain.ObjectiveTo determine whether SDD is associated with reduced risk of death in adults receiving mechanical ventilation in intensive care units (ICUs) compared with standard care.Data SourcesThe primary search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases until September 2022.Study SelectionRandomized clinical trials including adults receiving mechanical ventilation in the ICU comparing SDD vs standard care or placebo.Data Extraction and SynthesisData extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed in duplicate. The primary analysis was conducted using a bayesian framework.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was hospital mortality. Subgroups included SDD with an intravenous agent compared with SDD without an intravenous agent. There were 8 secondary outcomes including the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, ICU-acquired bacteremia, and the incidence of positive cultures of antimicrobial-resistant organisms.ResultsThere were 32 randomized clinical trials including 24 389 participants in the analysis. The median age of participants in the included studies was 54 years (IQR, 44-60), and the median proportion of female trial participants was 33% (IQR, 25%-38%). Data from 30 trials including 24 034 participants contributed to the primary outcome. The pooled estimated risk ratio (RR) for mortality for SDD compared with standard care was 0.91 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.82-0.99; I2 = 33.9%; moderate certainty) with a 99.3% posterior probability that SDD reduced hospital mortality. The beneficial association of SDD was evident in trials with an intravenous agent (RR, 0.84 [95% CrI, 0.74-0.94]), but not in trials without an intravenous agent (RR, 1.01 [95% CrI, 0.91-1.11]) (P value for the interaction between subgroups = .02). SDD was associated with reduced risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (RR, 0.44 [95% CrI, 0.36-0.54]) and ICU-acquired bacteremia (RR, 0.68 [95% CrI, 0.57-0.81]). Available data regarding the incidence of positive cultures of antimicrobial-resistant organisms were not amenable to pooling and were of very low certainty.Conclusions and RelevanceAmong adults in the ICU treated with mechanical ventilation, the use of SDD compared with standard care or placebo was associated with lower hospital mortality. Evidence regarding the effect of SDD on antimicrobial resistance was of very low certainty.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference55 articles.

1. The effect of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on colonisation and infection rate in multiple trauma patients.;Stoutenbeek;Intensive Care Med,1984

2. Antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce respiratory tract infections and mortality in adults receiving intensive care.;Liberati;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2009

3. Topical antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce respiratory tract infections and mortality in adults receiving mechanical ventilation.;Minozzi;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2021

4. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.;Dellinger;Crit Care Med,2013

5. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.;Evans;Crit Care Med,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3