Abortion Miscoding—Legal Risks for Clinicians and Hospital Systems-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Abortion Miscoding—Legal Risks for Clinicians and Hospital Systems

Published:2023-06-13 Issue:22 Volume:329 Page:1911
ISSN:0098-7484
Container-title:JAMA
language:en
Short-container-title:JAMA

Author:

Chary Sravya¹,Pacia Danielle²,Shachar Carmel³

Affiliation:

1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts

2. The Hastings Center, Garrison, New York

3. The Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Abstract

This Viewpoint discusses the legal risks physicians and health care facilities may incur by miscoding a surgical or chemical abortion as a miscarriage to conceal an abortion procedure.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Link

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/2805410/jama_chary_2023_vp_230045_1686240952.48348.pdf

Reference8 articles.

1. Medical malpractice.;Studdert;N Engl J Med,2004

2. Medication to manage abortion and miscarriage.;Beaman;J Gen Intern Med,2020

3. Health care fraud and abuse.;Kalb;JAMA,1999

4. Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 US_(2022). Accessed May 16, 2023.? https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf

5. False Claims Act, 31 USC §§3729-3733 (1863). Accessed May 16, 2023.? https://www.justice.gov/civil/false-claims-act

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. US Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Perceived Impacts of Post–Dobbs v Jackson State Abortion Bans;JAMA Network Open;2024-01-17

2. One Year After Dobbs—Vast Changes to the Abortion Legal Landscape;JAMA Health Forum;2023-08-03